Manajemen Strategi Pengembangan Akademik dan Budaya Perguruan Tinggi Islam Di Indonesia : Inovasi Menuju Karakter Ulul Albab

Zainal Abidin

doi:10.29300/attalim.v22i1.2786

Manajemen Strategi Pengembangan Akademik dan Budaya Perguruan Tinggi Islam Di Indonesia : Inovasi Menuju Karakter Ulul Albab

Zainal Abidin

Abstract

Abstract: Implementation of Learning of The Akidah Akhlak In The Character of Loving The Country.
The strategy for developing an academic culture can create students who have a sense of eco-spirituality in interacting with nature. This study aims to examine the strategy for developing the academic culture and religious character of Ulul Albab which produces graduates of Indonesian Islamic Universities with a case study at Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu State Islamic University. Qualitative research methods are applied to conduct research. The results of the research show that the strategy for developing academic and religious culture can be built through: 1) Integration of religion and science; 2) Integration of Universities and Ma'had/boarding schools; 3) Orientation for the formation of Ulul Albab; 4) Setting standards for the success of Ulul Albab Bachelors; 5) Setting goals and commitments; 6) Building a fasting culture; 7) Open, mutual dialogue and advice; 8) Oriented to equality and togetherness; 9) appropriate and strong leadership through spiritual, emotional, intellectual, and social approaches; 10) Developing a culture of writing and research; and 11) Creating new innovations continuously. The research finding model is a strategy for developing academic and religious culture in Islamic tertiary institutions in Indonesia to produce graduates with Ulul Albab Character.

Abstrak: Manajemen Strategi Pengembangan Akademik dan Budaya Perguruan Tinggi Islam Di Indonesia : Inovasi Menuju Karakter Ulul Albab.
Strategi pengembangan budaya akademik dapat menciptakan mahasiswa yang memiliki rasa eco-spirituality dalam berinteraksi dengan alam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji strategi pengembangan budaya akademik dan karakter religius Ulul Albab yang menghasilkan lulusan Perguruan Tinggi Islam Indonesia dengan studi kasus di Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu. Metode penelitian kualitatif diterapkan untuk melakukan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi pengembangan budaya akademik dan keagamaan dapat dibangun melalui: 1) Integrasi agama dan ilmu pengetahuan; 2) Integrasi Perguruan Tinggi dan Ma'had/pondok; 3) Orientasi pembentukan Ulul Albab; 4) Menetapkan standar keberhasilan Sarjana Ulul Albab; 5) Menetapkan tujuan dan komitmen; 6) Membangun budaya puasa; 7) Terbuka, dialog timbal balik dan nasihat; 8) Berorientasi kesamaan dan kebersamaan; 9) kepemimpinan yang tepat dan kuat melalui pendekatan spiritual, emosional, intelektual, dan sosial; 10) Mengembangkan budaya menulis dan meneliti; dan 11) Menciptakan inovasi baru secara terus menerus. Model temuan penelitian adalah strategi pengembangan akademik dan budaya keagamaan di perguruan tinggi Islam di Indonesia untuk melahirkan lulusan yang berkarakter Ulul Albab.

Keywords

Academic Culture; Management Innovation; Ulul Albab character

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alghamdi, N., den Heijer, A., & de Jonge, H. (2017). Assessment tools’ indicators for sustainability in universities: An analytical overview. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(1), 84–115.

Almohtaseb, A. A., Almahameed, M. A. Y., Shaheen, H. A. K., & Jarrar Al Khattab, M. H. (2019). A roadmap for developing, implementing and evaluating performance management systems in Jordan public universities. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04- 2018-0061

Altbach P G 2009 Peripheries and centers: Research universities in developing countries. Asia Pacific Education Review 10 (1) pp. 15-27.

Berg B L, Lune H, Lune H 2004 Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Brown JS , Collins A, Duguid P 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning.

Cheong CY, Ming TW 1997 Multi-models of quality in education. Quality assurance in Education 5(1) pp. 22-31.

Datta, K. (2020). Application of SWOTTOWS Matrix and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the formulation of geoconservation and geotourism development strategies for mama bhagne pahar: An important geomorphosite in West Bengal, India. Geoheritage, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020- 00467-2

David, F. R., David, F. R., & David, M. E. (2011). Strategic management concepts and case: A competitive advantage approach. Pearson. Den Heijer, A., & Magdaniel, F. C. (2018). Campus–city relations: Past, present, and future. Geographies of the University, 12(3), 439.

Diana, N. (2017). Evaluasi manajemen mutu internal di fakultas tarbiyah dan keguruan dengan metode Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Education. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 02(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v2i2.2 178

Dill D D 1982 The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration. Higher education 11(3) pp. 303-320.

Educational researcher, 18(1) pp. 32-42.

Fadjar A M, Effendy M 199) Dunia perguruan tinggi dan kemahasiswaan. Pusat Publikasi dan Penerbitan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Feldman M P, Desrochers P 2004 Truth for its own sake: academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva 42(2) pp. 105-126.

Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S. (2009). Performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(6), 478–498.

Glass‐Coffin 2016 Building capacity and transforming lives: Anthropology undergraduates and religious campus‐climate research on a public university campus. Annals of Anthropological Practice, 40(2) pp. 258-269.

Guba E G 1981 Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ 29(2). pp 75.

Gumport P J 2000 Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher education 39(1) pp. 67-91.

Hsieh H F, Shannon S E 2005 Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research 15(9) pp. 1277-1288.

Jorge, J. M., De Oliveira, A. C. A., & Dos Santos, A. C. (2020). Analyzing how university is preparing engineering students for industry 4.0. In P. J., G. M., N. L., S. J., & W. N. (Eds.), Transdisciplinary Engeenering for Complex Socio-Technical SystemReal Life Applications (Vol. 12, pp. 82–91). IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE20006

Karuhanga, B. N. (2015). Evaluating implementation of strategic performance management practices in universities in Uganda. Measuring Business Excellence, 19(2), 42–56.

Karuniawati, H., Hassali, M. A. A., Suryawati, S., Ismail, W. I., Taufik, T., & Wiladatika, A. (2020). Public practices towards antibiotics: A qualitative study. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 8(4), 1277–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.0 4.027

Kibler W L 1993 A framework for addressing academic dishonesty from a student development perspective. NASPA journal 31(1) pp 8-18.

Krishnakumar S, Neck CP 2002 The “what”,“why” and “how” of spirituality in the workplace. Journal of managerial psychology, 17(3) pp .153-164.

Lackritz J R 2004. Exploring burnout among university faculty: incidence, performance, and demographic issues. Teaching and teacher education, 20(7) pp. 713-729.

Lundvall B Å, Johnson B, Andersen E S, Dalum B 2002. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research policy, 31(2) pp. 213-231.

Mabogunje, A. (2015). The development process: A spatial perspective. Routledge.

Magdaniel, F. C., De Jonge, H., & Den Heijer, A. (2018). Campus development as catalyst for innovation. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(2), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-07- 2016-0025

McConnell MW 1990 Academic freedom in religious colleges and universities. Law and Contemporary Problems 53(3) pp. 303-324.

Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., & Alkhalefah, H. (2020). Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: Channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 6100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156100

Miles M B, Huberman A M 1994 Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. (1992). Cycles of organizational change. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 39–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.100 2/smj.4250130905

Naisbitt J, Naisbitt D 2010 China's megatrends: The 8 pillars of a new society. Harper Collins.

Onder, M., & Nyadera, I. N. (2019). The role of non-economic drivers in development planning: The case of South Korea and Turkey. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.20 19.1628057

Parker N K 2008 The quality dilemma in online education revisited. The theory and practice of online learning. pp 305.

Peterson M W, Spencer, MG 1990 Understanding academic culture and climate. New directions for institutional research 1990 (68) pp. 3-18.

Rosen E 2008 The Muslim Brotherhood's Concept of Education. Current Trends in Islamist Ideology 7. pp 115.

Swidler A 1986 Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American sociological review. pp. 273-286.

Weisse W 2007 The European research project on religion and education ‘REDCo’. An introduction. Religion and education in Europe: Developments, contexts and debates. pp. 9-25.

Yorke M 2000 Developing a quality culture in higher education. Tertiary Education & Management 6(1) pp 19-36.

Yusuf M 2010 Memorization as a learning style: A balance approach to academic excellence

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/attalim.v22i1.2786