Development of the Discovery With Team Assisted Individualization (DTAI) Model to Empower Analytical Thinking Ability in the Material Human Reproductive System

Aulia Setia Novitasari, Sutarno Sutarno, Mohammad Masykuri

Abstract


The objectives of this research and development are: to find out the characteristics of the Discovery with Team Assisted Individualization (D-TAI) learning model, determine the feasibility of the D-TAI learning model, and test the effectiveness of the product model in empowering analytical thinking skills. Model development research refers to Borg & Gall, which was adapted into nine stages: research and data collection, planning, initial product development, initial testing, product revision I, main field revision, product revision II, operational field revision, and final product revision . Analysis of the data used is a qualitative and quantitative descriptive analysis using the Mann Whitney U test. The results of the research and development show: the development of the D-TAI model was carried out with regard to the characteristics of the model. the results of the development of the D-TAI model are applied to the material of the human reproductive system. D-TAI model is able to empower students' analytical thinking skills. The results of the study show a significant difference between the value of analytical thinking skills in the D-TAI model class and the control class that is the average value of the D-TAI model class (74.79) higher than the control class ( 55.91) control with sig level 0.00 <0.05.

Keywords


Discovery; TAI; D-TAI Model; Thinking Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akdeniz. F. & Tarim, K. (2008). The effects of

cooperative learning on Turkish elementary

students' mathematics achievement and attitude

towards mathematics using T.A.I. and S.T.A.D.

Methods. Educational Studies in Mathematics,

Vol. 67, No. 1 (Jan., 2008), pp. 77-91.

Balim, Ali Gunay. (2009). The effect of Discovery

Learning on Student Success and Inquiry

Learning Skills. Egitim ArastirmalariEurasian Journal of Educational

Research.35,1-20.

BSNP. (2013). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional

Tahun Pelajaran 2012-2013 (software).

Dahar, Ratna Wilis. (2011). Teori – teori Belajar

dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Elder, Linda. Paul, Richard. (2007). The thinker’s

guide to analytical thinking, how to take thinking

apart and what to look for when you do, the

element of thinking and the standards they must

meet. http://www.criticalthinking.org.

Diakses pada tanggal 11 Januari 2015.

Fatmawati, Dwitya Nadia. (2013). Pengembangan

Model Pembelajaran Experiental Learning

yang Diarahkan untuk Strategi

Pembelajaran Think Talk Write di Kelas

XI SMA Taruna Nusantara

Magelang. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Surakar

ta: PPS Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Gijlers, H., de Jong, T. (2005). The relation between

prior knowledge and students’ collaborative

discovery learning processes. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 42, 264-282.

Husain. R. T. (2013). Penerapan MetodeDisco

very Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar

Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Qur'an Hadits.

Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Jurnal of pedagogi

ka. Vol 4. No. 1.

Ilahi, Muhammad Takdir.(2012). Pembelajaran

Discovery Strategi dan Mental Vocational Skill.

Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Jannah, S. I. (2009). Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran

Tai (Team Assisted Individualiztion) Dalam

Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada

Mata Pelajaran Pai. UIN Sunan Ampel

Surabaya. Vol 2. No 2.

Jonassen, David H. and Hung, Woci. (2008).

All Problems are not Equal:Implications for

Problem-Based Learning. The

Interdisclipnary Journal of Problem-Based

Learning. Vol 2. No 2.

Joolingen, W. F. 2007. Coognitive Tools for Discovery

Learning. International Journal of Artificial

Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 10,

pp.385-397Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. 2004. Models

of Teaching. Boston: Pearson Education,

Inc.

Kemendikbud.(2013). Materi Pelatihan Guru

Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Hand out:258-

Laksani, Mertiara Ratih Terry. (2013). Pengaruh

Model Pembelajaran Teams Assisted

Individualization terhadap Kemampuan

Berpikir Analitis Pada Mata Pelajaran

Geografi Siswa Kelas X Public Senior

High School 1 Malang. Skripsi, Jurusan

Pendidikan Geografi FIS Universitas

Negeri Malang.

Lavine, Robert A. (2005). Guided Discovery

Learning with Videotaped Case

Presentation in Neurobiology. IAMSE

Volume 15: 4-7.

Listyani, E. (2011). Implementasi Metode Inquiri

Dipadukan dengan Startegi Kooperatif Untuk

Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis.

Yogyakarta. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Vol 2. No 1.

Mahmudah, Laili. (2014). Pembelajaran Fisika

Menggunakan Metode Pictorial Riddle Dan

Problem Solving Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan

Berpikir Kritis Dan Kemampuan Analisis.

Universitas Sebelas Maret. Vol 3. No 2

Montaku.S. (2011). Result of Analytical Thinking

Skills Training Trought Student in System

Analysis and Design.

Nneji, Awofala. 2010. Effect of Framing and Team

Assisted Individualized’ Instructional Strategies

on Students’ Achievement in

Mathematics.Journal of Science Teachers' A

ssociation of Nigeria. Vol 2. No 3. Page 23-28.

Rose, Colin., and Malcolm J. Nicholl. 2002.

Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century.

Bandung: Nuansa.

Schunk, Dale. H. (2012).Learning TheoriesA Per

pesctive Education(Terjemahan).

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Media.

Silberman, Mel. (2001). 101 StrategiPembelajaran

Aktif. Yogyakarta : Pustaka pelajar.

Siregar. E. Dan Nara, H, (2010). Teori Belajar dan

Pembelajaran. Bogor: Gahlia Indonesia.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang

Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Slavin, Robert E, (2009).Cooperative Learning:

Teori, Riset dan Praktik, Bandung: Nusa

Media.

Trianto. (2007). Model – Model Pembelajaran Inovatif

Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi

Pustaka Publisher.

Udo, Mfon Effiong. (2010). Department of Science

Education, University of Uyo, Uyo Cross River

State, Nigeria. An International MultiDisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia. Vol. 4 (4),

Serial No. 16. Pp. 389-398.

UNESCO. (2013). Revisiting Learning: The Treasure

Within Assessing The Influence of The 1996

Delors Report. United Nations Educational,

Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Uslde. (2013). Effect Of Discovery Method On

Secondary School Student’s Achievement In

Physics In Kenya. Asian Journal Of Social

Sciences & Humanities. Vol 2. No 3.

Wahyuni, T. (2014). Perbedaan Model Guided

Discovery Learning Berbantu Concept Map

Dengan Model Konvensional Terhadap

Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa Kelas Xi

pa Public Senior High School 5 Surakarta.

Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Wilke, R. Russel. dan Straits, W. (2015). The Effect

Of Discovery Learning In A Lower-Division

Biology Course. Advances in Physiol Edu.

Vol 25. No 2. Page 62-69




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v2i2.6490

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id

 

Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu

 

  Creative Commons License
IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License