Penguatan Literasi Akademik Mahasiswa melalui Klinik Karya Ilmiah sebagai Model Pendampingan Berkelanjutan di Perguruan Tinggi
Abstract
The quality of students’ scientific writing is a crucial indicator in assessing academic standards and program accreditation. However, many students continue to face difficulties in formulating research problems, understanding research methodology, and writing according to academic conventions. To address these challenges, the Government Science Study Program of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, implemented the Scientific Writing Clinic as a systematic mentoring initiative to enhance students’ academic writing skills. Conducted over four weeks, the program applied a student-centered learning approach. The activities consisted of three main stages: Clinic Series I, which focused on identifying research problems and developing research background; Clinic Series II, which addressed social research methods; and the Intensive Consultation Clinic, which provided continuous personalized guidance. A total of 208 students participated in both offline and online sessions. Evaluation results indicate that approximately 91% of participants experienced improved abilities in designing research and writing scientific papers systematically. Beyond strengthening methodological literacy, the program also fostered self-confidence, reflective abilities, and a collaborative academic culture among students. The Scientific Writing Clinic proved effective as a sustainable mentoring model that can be adopted to enhance the quality of students’ scientific work and support program accreditation achievements
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi (BAN-PT). Instrumen Akreditasi Program Studi (IAPS) 4.0. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, 2020.
Bungin, B. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi: Format-Format Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Untuk Studi Sosiologi, Kebijakan Publik, Komunikasi, Manajemen, Dan Pemasaran. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications., 2018.
Daryanto, & Karim, S. Pembelajaran Abad 21. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2017.
Djamarah, S. B. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2011.
Hamalik, O. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.
Humas FISIP Universitas Mulawarman. “Profil Dan Data Akreditasi Program Studi FISIP Universitas Mulawarman.” Samarinda, 2013.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. “The ‘Academic Literacies’ Model: Theory and Applications.” Theory into Practice 44, no. 4 (2006): 368–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11.
Moleong, L. J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019.
Neuman, W. L. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th Ed.). England: Pearson Education Limite, 2014.
Punch, K. F. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Rusman. Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
Suryadi, A. Bimbingan Akademik Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Tinggi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
Wingate, U. “No Using Academic Literacies and Genre-Based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A ‘Literacy’ Journey.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11, no. 1 (2012): 26–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mjppm.v14i2.9305
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mjppm.v14i2.9305.g5970
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




