EFL LECTURERS' AND STUDENTS' ACADEMIC WRITING EXPERIENCE AND CHALLENGES IN USING AI WRITING TOOLS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
Abstract
This study investigates the experiences and challenges of lecturers and students in the English Tadris Study Program of IAIN Curup in using AI writing tools for academic work. Using a qualitative approach with purposive sampling, data were collected from one lecturer and ten students through interviews, supported by a preliminary pilot study confirming the integration of AI in academic writing practices. The findings reveal that AI enhances idea development, organization, syntactic accuracy, vocabulary refinement, and writing confidence, functioning as a cognitive accelerator that streamlines the writing process. However, significant challenges emerge, including shallow idea generation, rigid structures, machine-like language, inaccurate citations, limited access to premium AI features, and insufficient prompt literacy. The discussion highlights deeper pedagogical implications, particularly the shifting paradigm from “writing as creation” to “writing as collaboration,” emphasizing the lecturer’s role as mediator of ethical AI use. Psychological transformations also appear, where efficiency leads to dependency, forming a “comfort paradox” that threatens independent thinking and authorial identity. The study concludes with recommendations for institutional AI guidelines, AI literacy integration, equitable access, and pedagogical redesign to balance automation with originality.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbarani, R. , & P. F. D. (2023). The Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing. In Proceeding of Annual International Conference on Islamic Education (AICIED), 1, 63–71.
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? In Reproductive BioMedicine Online (Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 3–9). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009
Altunkaya, H., & Ayranci, B. (2020). The use of Edmodo in academic writing education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.712659
Bailey, D. , S. A. , & C. J. (2021). Digital storytelling with chatbots: Mapping L2 participation and perception patterns. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.
Belland, B. R., & Kim, N. J. (2021). Predicting high school students’ argumentation skill using information literacy and trace data. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1897967
Belland, B. R., Weiss, D. M., & Kim, N. J. (2020). High school students’ agentic responses to modeling during problem-based learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(5), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1838407
Burkhard, M. (2022). STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF AI-POWERED WRITING TOOLS: TOWARDS INDIVIDUALIZED TEACHING STRATEGIES. https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker
Chang, T.-S., Li, Y., Huang, H.-W., & Whitfield, B. (2021). Exploring EFL Students’ Writing Performance and Their Acceptance of AI-based Automated Writing Feedback. 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459043.3459065
Creswell, J. (2014). Educational Research, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative. Pearson Education, Inc.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Froemming, C. & C. L. (2020). Professional Development for Technology Integration in the Early Elementary Grades. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 444–450.
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Genot, E. J. (2018). Strategies of inquiry. Synthese, 195(5), 2065–2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x
Grogan, K. E. (2021). Writing Science: What Makes Scientific Writing Hard and How to Make It Easier. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1800
Haristiani, N. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot as language learning medium: An inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 1387(1).
Holmes, W. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education. In Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_107-1
Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2024). Using AI to write scholarly publications. In Accountability in Research (Vol. 31, Issue 7, pp. 715–723). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and Researching Writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717203
Jeanjaroonsri, R. (2023). Thai EFL Learners’ Use and Perceptions of Mobile Technologies for Writing. In Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (Vol. 16, Issue 1). https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
Jia, J., He, Y., & Le, H. (2020). A Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction System and Its Application in Smart Learning Environments (pp. 3–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_1
Kim, N. J., Vicentini, C. R., & Belland, B. R. (2022). Influence of Scaffolding on Information Literacy and Argumentation Skills in Virtual Field Trips and Problem-Based Learning for Scientific Problem Solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10145-y
Lindsay, D. (2020). Scientific Writing = Thinking in Words. CSIRO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1071/9781486311484
Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Zhu, D., Li, X., Qiang, N., Shen, D., Liu, T., & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017
Lizzio, A. , W. K. , & S. R. (2022). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.
Luckin, R. , H. W. , G. M. , and F. L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Prentice, F. M., & Kinden, C. E. (2018). Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: An exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0036-7
Putri, D. , & V. U. Y. (2023). The Effects of Using Cake Application To Improve Listening Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of State Senior High School 2 of Tungkal Jaya.
Qin, F., Li, K., & Yan, J. (2020). Understanding user trust in artificial intelligence‐based educational systems: Evidence from China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12994
Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y
Rudolph, J. T. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Shidiq, M. (2023). The Use Of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chat- Gpt And Its Challenges For The World Of Education; From The Viewpoint Of The Development Of Creative Writing Skills. 01(01), 353–357.
So, W.-C., Wong, M. K.-Y., Lam, W.-Y., Cheng, C.-H., Ku, S.-Y., Lam, K.-Y., Huang, Y., & Wong, W.-L. (2019). Who is a better teacher for children with autism? Comparison of learning outcomes between robot-based and human-based interventions in gestural production and recognition. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 86, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.01.002
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education: The Challenges and Opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
Supriyadi, S. (n.d.). A new decade for social changes Evaluation Instrument Development for Scientific Writing Instruction with A Constructivism Approach. Www.Techniumscience.Com, 21, 2021. www.techniumscience.com
Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Higher Education: Advantages, Disadvantages, Conveniences and Limitations of Applying E-learning to Agricultural Students in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. In Science (Vol. 379, Issue 6630, p. 313). American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
Wicks, D. (2017). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition). Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(2), 169–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-08-2016-1408
Woo, D. J., Blood, P., School, S., Kong, H., Susanto, H., Yeung, C. H., Guo, K., Ka, A., Fung, Y., & Ping, H. (2024). Exploring AI-Generated text in student writing: How does AI help? In Language Learning & Technology (Vol. 28, Issue 2). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73577
Zhao, X. (2023). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for English Writing: Introducing Wordtune as a Digital Writing Assistant for EFL Writers. In RELC Journal (Vol. 54, Issue 3, pp. 890–894). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v11i2.9666
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching
Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Telp. (0736)51171,51172,51276 Fax.(0736) 51172
Website : https://uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/
Email : linguists@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Abstracting and Indexing by:
