IMPLEMENTATION DEBATING TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING SPEAKING (Descriptive Study of Student At Twelve Level of SMAN1 Curup )
Abstract
This research described the implementation of the debate technique in teaching speaking of
SMAN 1 Curup and analysis how debate technique can be applied for speaking class and it
can be a good way to make students’ speaking more better as their skill of languange mastery
in English. The debating activity of this class is a kind of debate that different with australian
or parlementary style where of Parlementary style the student present in each group contain 3
members and when they present the debating activity there are 2 groups. The group of
Affirmative which agree to the motion given and the Negative group which dissagree to the
motion. While on Australian style the each group has two members and in delivering activity
there are 4 group of its presentation. Two groups for Affirmative group and two group for
negative group.
The observation have three steps the firsly,t to get data who students that has ability in speaking
well they will be the main group. The main group contain of 6-7 students of each class and they
will be an opposite group for other group of the class. It is about 5 group will present of the
class with the opposite team for the students who has ability well in speaking. The
observervations had been done directly in the class, it need 4-6 weeks of each class. Secondly,
they present their debating with the motion given with the turn and motion that given lottery
randomly.
Next, after the debating held of each class the observer give another activity by asking them to
present speaking individually, and there is good result, their speaking performance increase
to be better than of the first activity before debating
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Advanced_Rebuttal,from:http://www.sacredheartschool.ns.ca/studentopportunities/
PDF/Advanced RebuttalReply.pdf retrieved on November 28th 2011
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar, 2000, Pokoknya kualitatif; Dasar — Dasar merancang dan Melakukan
Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta : Pustaka Jaya
Bashir. Muhammad Reliability and Validity of Qualitative and Operational Research
Paradigm. Pakistan
Bogdan , Robert.C, 1982, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and
Methods, USA: Alin and Bacon inc Boston London Sydney Toronto
Brown, Penelove and Stephen C. Levinson, 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage, Cambridge : Cambridge U.P
Cohen, Louis and friends. 2000, Research Method in Education 5th Edition, New York :
Routledgefalmer, USA,
Creswell, John W. 2010, Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif Kuantitatif, dan Mixed,
Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
D'cruz, Ray 2003, The Australia- Asia Debating Guide, Second Edition, North Melbourne :
Australian Debating Federation
D'slim , ELC, Debater's Briefing "Phantom""Phantom" Public Health Engglish Debate
Comppetition , BEM School of Public Health Airlangga University
Danim, Sudarwan, Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif. 2002. CV Pustaka Setia: Bandung.
Dawson, Catherine, 2002, Practical Research Methods, Wiltshire: Cromwell Press
Guide , 2004, Junior Chamber International Worldwide Federation of Young Laders and
Entrepreneurs
Emi, 2008, Menulis Thesis dan Disertasi, Bandung:Alfabeta
Cohn, Debating Tutorial handouts, from:
http://flynn.debating.net/handbook.pdf, retrieved on November 25th 2011
Jack R. and Norman E. Wallen, 2008 How to design and evaluate research in ducation, New
York : McGraw-Hill
R.,2000. Education Research: Competence for Analysis and Application, Florida::
International University
Patrick, 2006, An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics, dinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press
Peter, 2000, Doing Pragmatics, Second Edition, London : Arnold
K, Beferly, Trend Focus for Research and Developing in Primary Helath Care: In Introduction
to Qualitative Research, Trend Focus: 1998
Permata„ 1999, What is Competitive Debating? An Introductory Course on Competitive
Debating Skills, Jakarta : English Debating Society Universitas Indonesia.
AS, 2005, Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, New York : Oxford
University Press
Nation Curriculum Center Lesson Plan from http://www.ailf.org/teach/lessonplans/m4
issuesinimmigration.pdf, retrieved on Desember 2nd 2011
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v2i2.114

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching
Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Telp. (0736)51171,51172,51276 Fax.(0736) 51172
Website : https://uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/
Email : linguists@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Abstracting and Indexing by: