Enhancing Prospective Teachers' Skills in Designing Physics Learning: Developing Electronic Learning Materials with Interactive Reading, Scaffolding and Modeling (IRTaMS) Strategies
Abstract
This study explores the development and implementation of electronic learning materials with interactive reading, scaffolding, and modelling (IRTaMS) strategies to improve the knowledge and skills of prospective physics teachers in designing learning that refers to the 4C skills-oriented Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model. This study uses the ADDIE development model which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research subjects involved 24 prospective teachers of the Physics Education Program at a university in West Kalimantan with a pre-experimental one-group pre-test–posttest design. The research instruments included expert validation sheets, attitude scales, knowledge tests, and skill assessment rubrics. Data analysis includes; analysis of the validity of learning products using Aiken's V coefficient from expert judges' scores, percentage analysis to determine the level of readability, Wilcoxon Test to measure the significance of the difference between pre-test and post-test (including pre-task and post-task), and analysis of the average N-Gain (<g>) to determine the extent of the increase in knowledge and skills of prospective teachers. The results of expert validation and user responses indicate that electronic learning materials with IRTaMS strategies have a high level of validity and readability. The results of the study also showed a significant increase in the knowledge and skills of prospective teachers in designing PBL-based physics learning oriented to 4C skills, as reflected in the N-Gain value in the medium to high category. Skills improvement includes the formulation of learning objectives, criteria for achieving learning objectives, teaching materials, assessment planning, media use, and learning stages. The research findings indicate that the integration of IRTaMS strategies in digital technology-based electronic learning materials has strong potential in strengthening the pedagogical competence of prospective physics teachers, although comparative exploration with a control group is still needed in further research. This study contributes to the development of digital learning innovations through practical and contextual approaches to support 21st-century physics learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abed, E. H. (2017). Electronic learning and its benefits in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469–477.
Alenezi, A. (2020). The role of e-learning materials in enhancing teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 48–56.
Angeli, C. (2002). Teachers’ practical theories for the design and implementation of problembased learning. Science Education International, 13(3), 9–15.
Astuti, A. P., Aziz, A., Sumarti, S. S., & Bharati, D. A. L. (2019). Preparing 21st Century Teachers: Implementation of 4C Character’s Pre-Service Teacher through Teaching Practice. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012109
Bahari, A., Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021). Membangun model membaca interaktif berbantuan komputer. Komputer & Pendidikan, 172, 104261.
Banditvilai, C. (2020). The Effectiveness of Reading Strategies on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.v10.1012
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Approach, Instructional Design: The ADDIE. In Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology University of Georgia (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using multimedia supported the learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12.
Cahyadi, R. A. H. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Addie Model. Halaqa: Islamic Education Journal, 3(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.21070/halaqa.v3i1.2124
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 1–18.
Dolmans, D. H., Snellen-Balendong, H., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (1997). Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 185–189.
Duch, B. J. (2001). Writing problems for deeper understanding. The Power of Problem-Based Learning, 47058.
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fu, B. (2015). Interactive Reading Model and College English Reading. International Conference on Education, Management, Arts, Economics and Social Science, 670–673. https://doi.org/10.2991/icemaess-15.2016.143
Goodnough, K. C., & Hung, W. (2008). Engaging teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: Adopting a nine-step problem-based learning model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2).
Gupta, S. (2017). The effect of e-learning in the digital age. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), 1–8.
Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. Physics Education Research Conference, 8(1), 1–14.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 4.
Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning–what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161.
Keenan, C. (2014). Mapping student-led peer learning in the UK. Higher Education Academy, 8, 1–50.
Koňušíková, M., & Kostelník, J. (2009). Creation and effectiveness of educational texts for directed self learning at secondary technical schools.
Kulo, S. A., Odundo, P. A., & Agnes. (2019). Interactive Reading Strategies on Learner Achievement in Reading Skills in Secondary Schools in Kisumu County, Kenya. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 7 (5), 1, 13(5), 1–13.
Matsun, M., Pramuda, A., Hadiati, S., & Pratama, H. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking in physics education: developing an Arduino-based GMC as an innovative learning tool. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 20(1), 578–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org 10.11591/edulearn.v20i1.22739
Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115
Nurhayati, N., Suhandi, A., Muslim, M., & Kaniawati, I. (2023). Analysis of teachers and prospective physics teachers’ difficulties in implementing problem-based learning model to improve students’ 4c skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596(1), 012058.
Nurhayati, Suhandi, A., Muslim, Kaniawati, I., Wahyudi, Misbah, & Darman, D. R. (2025). Assessing the Knowledge and Skills of Prospective Physics Teachers in Designing 4C Skills-Oriented Learning: Rasch Analysis. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 718–741. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1544
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Petek, E., & Bedir, H. (2018). An adaptable teacher education framework for critical thinking in language teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 56–72.
Pradhan, S., S. (2021). Effect Of Self-Study Materials on Learning Among Senior Secondary School Students. Sanshodhan Chetana, 10(2), 7–17.
Prihastuti, I., Widodo, A., Liliasari, & Riandi, R. (2020). Profil Kompetensi Guru Dalam Merancang, Melaksanakan Dan Menilai Pembelajaran Berpikir Kritis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 667–679. https://mail.prosiding.unma.ac.id/index.php/semnasfkip/article/download/379/362
Rahman, M. H. (2015). Learning assessment in a self learning material.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.
Rowe, N., Martin, R., Buck, R., & Mabingo, A. (2021). Teaching collaborative dexterity in higher education: Threshold concepts for educators. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(7), 1515–1529.
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9(2), 5–15.
Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Scaffolding Disciplined Inquiry in Problem-Based Environments Environments. Internasional Journal of Learning, 12(6), 297–305.
Tamim, S. R., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Definitions and Uses: Case Study of Teachers Implementing Project-based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1323
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12 education. Ascd.
Torres-Malca, J. R., Vera-Ponce, V. J., Zuzunaga-Montoya, F. E., Talavera, J. E., & De La Cruz-Vargas, J. A. (2022). Content validity by expert judgment of an instrument to measure knowledge, attitudes and practices about salt consumption in the peruvian population. Revista de La Facultad de Medicina Humana, 22(2), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v22i2.4768
Tyas, R. (2017). Kesulitan penerapan problem based learning dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Tecnoscienza, 2(1), 43–52.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Wahyudi, Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., & Samsudin, A. (2023). The Needs Analysis in the Development of Level of Inquiry with Project Assignments Model to Promote the Creativity of Prospective Physics Teachers. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i4.66461
Wong, M., Al-Arnawoot, A., & Hass, K. (2022). Student Perception of a Visual Novel for Fostering Science Process Skills. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.32
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Wright, D. B. (2020). Gain Scores, ANCOVA, and Propensity Matching Procedures for Evaluating Treatments in Education. Open Education Studies, 2(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0107
Yoon, H. J., & Woo, A. J. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ perception and their application methods of problem-based learning. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 30(5), 621–635.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v8i1.8379
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu

IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








