Profile of Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities in Higher Education on Chapter Heat and Temperature
Abstract
Students’ scientific literacy is very important to determine the extent to which students are literate about
the scientific concepts that have been learned. Therefore, prospective physics teacher students must
master scientific literacy to solve various problems from the real world as individuals and must interact in
society and the environment as social beings. The purpose of this study was to analyze the scientific
literacy skills of students of the 2019 class of physics education study program on chapter heat and
temperature. This type of research used to achieve these objectives is descriptive qualitative with
qualitative analysis. The subjects in this study were Lecturers in the basic physics course I and students of
the 2019 class of physics education study program at Universitas Cenderawasih. Data collection
techniques used in this study were tests, interviews, and documentation. The results of the research from
the test instrument showed that the scientific literacy skills of physics education students class 2019 were
still low. The results of the interviews strengthen the findings that there are still many physics education
students of 2019 who do not have scientific literacy skills of concepts on chapter heat and temperature.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A’yun, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Lisdiana, L. (2020).
Improving Students’ Critical Thinking
Skills through the STEM Digital Book.
Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(2),
–243.
Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and
temperature among physics students.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12,
–614.
Atmojo, S. E., Rusilowati, A., Dwiningrum, S. I.
A., & Skotnicka, M. (2018). The
reconstruction of disaster knowledge
through thematic learning of science,
environment, technology, and society
integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal
Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 204–213.
Bieber, T., & Martens, K. (2011). The OECD
PISA study as a soft power in education?
Lessons from Switzerland and the US.
European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101–
Budiarti, I. S., Suparmi, A., Sarwanto, &
Harjana. (2020). Effectiveness of
generation, evaluation, and modifica-tion-
cooperative learning (Gem-cl) model
selaras bakar batu cultural practice in
papua. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,
(1), 32–41.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22362
Budiarti, Indah Slamet, Suparmi, Sarwanto, &
Harjana. (2017). Students’ conceptual
understanding consistency of heat and
temperature. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series,
, 012051.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
/755/1/011001
Budiarti, Indah Slamet, & Tanta, T. (2021).
Analysis On Students’ Scientific Literacy
of Newton’s Law and Motion System in
Living Things. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains
Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science
Education), 9(1), 36–51.
Chusni, M. M., & Hasanah, A. (2018). Pengaruh
Kemampuan Pengelolaan Laboratorium
dan Literasi Sainfik Terhadap Kesiapan
Calon Guru Fisika. Berkala Ilmiah
Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 325.
https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i3.5222
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy:
Another look at its historical and
contemporary meanings and its
relationship to science education reform.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The
Official Journal of the National Association for
Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Goodman, S. N. (2016). Aligning statistical and
scientific reasoning. Science, 352(6290),
–1181.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012).
Developing a test of scientific literacy
skills (TOSLS): Measuring
undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific
information and arguments. CBE—Life
Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377.
Hadi, W. P., Munawaroh, F., Rosidi, I., &
Wardani, W. K. (2020). Penerapan Model
Pembelajaran Discovery Learning
Berpendekatan Etnosains untuk
Mengetahui Profil Literasi Sains Siswa
SMP. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA,
(2), 178–192.
https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v4i2.15771
Hallinger, P., Wang, W.-C., & Chen, C.-W.
(2013). Assessing the measurement
properties of the principal instructional
management rating scale: A meta-analysis
of reliability studies. Educational
Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 272–309.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The
nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of
Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The
qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage.
Ibrahim, J. T., Sutawi, & Jayus. (2013).
Performance Analysis Of Beef Cattle
Development Program Gaduhan Pattern
Revolving System ( Study In Bomberay
District Fakfak Regency West Papua
Province. Agrise, XIII(2).
Indarti, S. (2019). Investigasi Implementasi
Model Discovery Learning Berbasis
Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam
Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar
IPA. IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of
Integrated Science Education, 1(2), 100.
https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v1i2.22
Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Peningkatan
Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Mahasiswa
Tadris IPA Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik
Pada Mata kuliah IPA Terpadu. IJIS Edu :
Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science
Education, 1(1), 71.
https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v1i1.17
Mohr, K. A. J., & Mohr, E. S. (2017).
Understanding Generation Z Students to
Promote a Contemporary Learning
Environment. Journal on Empowering
Teaching Excellence, 1(1), 84–94.
https://doi.org/10.15142/T3M05T
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and
Analytical Framework PISA 2015
Assessment and Analytical Framework.
In OECD Publishing. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-
ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264190511-
en.pdf?expires=1569847112&id=id&accn
ame=guest&checksum=08AEA3FD9105
D4555A383BD097B5E
OECD. (2018). the Most Comprehensive and
Rigorous International Assessment of
Student Learning Outcomes To Date.
Programme for International Student
Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018,
–10.
Purbowo, A., Boy, B. Y., & Budiarti, I. S. (2020).
Penerapan Model Pembelajaran
Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams
Achievement Division untuk
meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. Papua Journal
of Physics Education, 1(1), 13–23.
https://doi.org/10.30596/liabilities.v1i1.
Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019). STEM
education to fulfil the 21st century
demand: a literature review. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 12208.
IOP Publishing.
Rini, E. S. (2020). The Effect of Problem Based
Learning on Cognitive Outcome in
Science Subject in Junior High School :
Topic Water Pollution. IJIS Edu :
Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science
Education, 2(2), 108.
https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v2i2.32
Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setyaningsih, W., &
Warno, D. S. (2020). Developing
Assessment Iinstruments of PISA Model
to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving
Skills and Scientific Literacy in Junior
High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains
Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science
Education), 8(2), 292–305.
https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468
Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D., &
Permana, I. (2016). Identify scientific
literacy from the science teachers’
perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA
Indonesia, 5(2), 299–303 Virtual Laboratory Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa
Calon Guru Pendidikan Fisika Universitas
Samudra. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA,
(2), 143–148.
https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v1i2.9688
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006).
Promoting Self-Regulation in Science
Education: Metacognition as Part of a
Broader Perspective on Learning. Research
in Science Education, 36(1), 111–139.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-
-8
Supriyadi, S., Palittin, I. D., & Martini, C. (n.d.).
Kajian Etnosains pada Indigenous
Science Suku Malind dalam Upaya
Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA
Kontekstual Papua. JPFT (Jurnal
Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 8(1).
Turner, R. (2018). How Proficient are ISU Non-
Science Majors in Scientific Literacy Skills Prior
to Their General Education Science Course?
Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016).
Fostering scientific literacy and critical
thinking in elementary science education.
International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680.
Winarti, C., Cari, A., Suparmi, I., Budiarti, J.,
Handhika, H., & Viyanti, V. (2017).
Identification of consistency and
conceptual understanding of the Black
principle. Ideas for 21st Century Education,
(2004), 249–252.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575
-50
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v3i1.6552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu
IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.