Profile of Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities in Higher Education on Chapter Heat and Temperature

Indah Slamet Budiarti, Rosmina Beno, Albert Lumbu, Viyanti Viyanti

Abstract


Students’ scientific literacy is very important to determine the extent to which students are literate about
the scientific concepts that have been learned. Therefore, prospective physics teacher students must
master scientific literacy to solve various problems from the real world as individuals and must interact in
society and the environment as social beings. The purpose of this study was to analyze the scientific
literacy skills of students of the 2019 class of physics education study program on chapter heat and
temperature. This type of research used to achieve these objectives is descriptive qualitative with
qualitative analysis. The subjects in this study were Lecturers in the basic physics course I and students of
the 2019 class of physics education study program at Universitas Cenderawasih. Data collection
techniques used in this study were tests, interviews, and documentation. The results of the research from
the test instrument showed that the scientific literacy skills of physics education students class 2019 were
still low. The results of the interviews strengthen the findings that there are still many physics education
students of 2019 who do not have scientific literacy skills of concepts on chapter heat and temperature.


Keywords


Heat and temperature; higher education; scientific literacy; student

Full Text:

PDF

References


A’yun, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Lisdiana, L. (2020).

Improving Students’ Critical Thinking

Skills through the STEM Digital Book.

Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(2),

–243.

Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and

temperature among physics students.

Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12,

–614.

Atmojo, S. E., Rusilowati, A., Dwiningrum, S. I.

A., & Skotnicka, M. (2018). The

reconstruction of disaster knowledge

through thematic learning of science,

environment, technology, and society

integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal

Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 204–213.

Bieber, T., & Martens, K. (2011). The OECD

PISA study as a soft power in education?

Lessons from Switzerland and the US.

European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101–

Budiarti, I. S., Suparmi, A., Sarwanto, &

Harjana. (2020). Effectiveness of

generation, evaluation, and modifica-tion-

cooperative learning (Gem-cl) model

selaras bakar batu cultural practice in

papua. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,

(1), 32–41.

https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22362

Budiarti, Indah Slamet, Suparmi, Sarwanto, &

Harjana. (2017). Students’ conceptual

understanding consistency of heat and

temperature. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series,

, 012051.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-

/755/1/011001

Budiarti, Indah Slamet, & Tanta, T. (2021).

Analysis On Students’ Scientific Literacy

of Newton’s Law and Motion System in

Living Things. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains

Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science

Education), 9(1), 36–51.

Chusni, M. M., & Hasanah, A. (2018). Pengaruh

Kemampuan Pengelolaan Laboratorium

dan Literasi Sainfik Terhadap Kesiapan

Calon Guru Fisika. Berkala Ilmiah

Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 325.

https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i3.5222

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy:

Another look at its historical and

contemporary meanings and its

relationship to science education reform.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The

Official Journal of the National Association for

Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.

Goodman, S. N. (2016). Aligning statistical and

scientific reasoning. Science, 352(6290),

–1181.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012).

Developing a test of scientific literacy

skills (TOSLS): Measuring

undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific

information and arguments. CBE—Life

Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377.

Hadi, W. P., Munawaroh, F., Rosidi, I., &

Wardani, W. K. (2020). Penerapan Model

Pembelajaran Discovery Learning

Berpendekatan Etnosains untuk

Mengetahui Profil Literasi Sains Siswa

SMP. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA,

(2), 178–192.

https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v4i2.15771

Hallinger, P., Wang, W.-C., & Chen, C.-W.

(2013). Assessing the measurement

properties of the principal instructional

management rating scale: A meta-analysis

of reliability studies. Educational

Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 272–309.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The

nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of

Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362.

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The

qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage.

Ibrahim, J. T., Sutawi, & Jayus. (2013).

Performance Analysis Of Beef Cattle

Development Program Gaduhan Pattern

Revolving System ( Study In Bomberay

District Fakfak Regency West Papua

Province. Agrise, XIII(2).

Indarti, S. (2019). Investigasi Implementasi

Model Discovery Learning Berbasis

Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam

Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar

IPA. IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of

Integrated Science Education, 1(2), 100.

https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v1i2.22

Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Peningkatan

Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Mahasiswa

Tadris IPA Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik

Pada Mata kuliah IPA Terpadu. IJIS Edu :

Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science

Education, 1(1), 71.

https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v1i1.17

Mohr, K. A. J., & Mohr, E. S. (2017).

Understanding Generation Z Students to

Promote a Contemporary Learning

Environment. Journal on Empowering

Teaching Excellence, 1(1), 84–94.

https://doi.org/10.15142/T3M05T

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and

Analytical Framework PISA 2015

Assessment and Analytical Framework.

In OECD Publishing. Retrieved from

https://www.oecd-

ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264190511-

en.pdf?expires=1569847112&id=id&accn

ame=guest&checksum=08AEA3FD9105

D4555A383BD097B5E

OECD. (2018). the Most Comprehensive and

Rigorous International Assessment of

Student Learning Outcomes To Date.

Programme for International Student

Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018,

–10.

Purbowo, A., Boy, B. Y., & Budiarti, I. S. (2020).

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran

Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams

Achievement Division untuk

meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. Papua Journal

of Physics Education, 1(1), 13–23.

https://doi.org/10.30596/liabilities.v1i1.

Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019). STEM

education to fulfil the 21st century

demand: a literature review. Journal of

Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 12208.

IOP Publishing.

Rini, E. S. (2020). The Effect of Problem Based

Learning on Cognitive Outcome in

Science Subject in Junior High School :

Topic Water Pollution. IJIS Edu :

Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science

Education, 2(2), 108.

https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v2i2.32

Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setyaningsih, W., &

Warno, D. S. (2020). Developing

Assessment Iinstruments of PISA Model

to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving

Skills and Scientific Literacy in Junior

High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains

Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science

Education), 8(2), 292–305.

https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468

Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D., &

Permana, I. (2016). Identify scientific

literacy from the science teachers’

perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA

Indonesia, 5(2), 299–303 Virtual Laboratory Untuk Meningkatkan

Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa

Calon Guru Pendidikan Fisika Universitas

Samudra. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA,

(2), 143–148.

https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v1i2.9688

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006).

Promoting Self-Regulation in Science

Education: Metacognition as Part of a

Broader Perspective on Learning. Research

in Science Education, 36(1), 111–139.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-

-8

Supriyadi, S., Palittin, I. D., & Martini, C. (n.d.).

Kajian Etnosains pada Indigenous

Science Suku Malind dalam Upaya

Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA

Kontekstual Papua. JPFT (Jurnal

Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 8(1).

Turner, R. (2018). How Proficient are ISU Non-

Science Majors in Scientific Literacy Skills Prior

to Their General Education Science Course?

Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016).

Fostering scientific literacy and critical

thinking in elementary science education.

International Journal of Science and

Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680.

Winarti, C., Cari, A., Suparmi, I., Budiarti, J.,

Handhika, H., & Viyanti, V. (2017).

Identification of consistency and

conceptual understanding of the Black

principle. Ideas for 21st Century Education,

(2004), 249–252.

https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575

-50




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v3i1.6552

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id

 

Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu

 

  Creative Commons License
IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License