Using the Rasch Model to Measure Students' Argumentative Ability in the Context of Socioscientific Issues About the Covid-19 Pandemic

Usman Amarto, Muhamad Yusup, Kistiono Kistiono

Abstract


Argumentation plays an essential role in developing a critical thinking and understanding or interpreting a central idea of the existing problem, In addition, students need arguments to strengthen understanding and knowledge in the learning process. Socioscientific Issues is a combination of social issues involving moral and ethical components and their relevance to science. This study aims to determine the argumentation ability of junior high school students in the context of socioscientific issues with the topic of the Covid-19 Pandemic. The research method used is descriptive research with careful decision-making and description of an educational phenomenon. The subjects of this study were 133 students, consisting of grades 9 in several junior high schools in Abab District, Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Regency. The technique of collecting research data employs a test with a total of three essay questions. Data from the study were analyzed using the Rasch model. The result showed that the argumentation skills of junior high school students were 57,29 out of 100 logits. This result indicates that, on average, students can put forward arguments by providing reasons that support their arguments.

Keywords


Rasch model, Argumentation, Socioscientific Issues, Pandemic Covid 19

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aleixo, A. M., Leal, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M.

(2021). Higher education students’

perceptions of sustainable development

in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production,

, 129429.

Ambarawati, D. S. H. E., Muslim, M., &

Hernani, H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan

Argumentasi Siswa SMP pada Materi

Pencemaran Lingkungan. INKUIRI: Jurnal

Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 13–17.

https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v10i1.2

Brinkman, W.-P. (2009). Design of a

Questionnaire Instrument. Handbook of

Mobile Technology Research Methods.

Chin, C. C., Yang, W. C., & Tuan, H. L. (2016).

Argumentation in a Socioscientific

Context and its Influence on

Fundamental and Derived Science

Literacies. International Journal of Science and

Mathematics Education, 14(4), 603–617.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-

-1

Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S. N., &

Höglund, H. O. (2012). Using the SEESEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary

Students’ Use of Supporting Reasons in

Arguing Socioscientific Issues. Journal of

Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 342–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-

-9328-x

Cian, H. (2020). The influence of context:

comparing high school students’

socioscientific reasoning by socioscientific

topic. International Journal of Science

Education.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.

Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2005).

The role of argumentation in developing

scientific literacy. Research and the Quality of

Science Education, 1, 381–394.

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-

_30

Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015).

Research trends on argumentation in

science education: a journal content

analysis from 1998–2014. International

Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-

-1

Karlsson, I. (n.d.). Social and economic

dimensions of sustainable development.

The Baltic University Programme, Uppsala

Centre for Sustainable Development, 1–17.

Md Ghazali, N. H. (2016). A Reliability and

Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the

School-Based Assessment System: A Pilot

Study. International Journal of Evaluation and

Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 148.

https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4533

Schratz, M. (2020). Voices in educational

research: An introduction. In Qualitative

Voices in Educational Research (pp. 1–6).

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008064

-1

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006).

Learning to teach argumentation:

Research and development in the science

classroom. International Journal of Science

Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069050033

Siregar, N., & Pakpahan, R. A. (2020).

Kemampuan Argumentasi Ipa Siswa

Melalui Pembelajaran Argumentasi

Driven Inquiry (Adi). LENSA (Lentera

Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 94–

https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i2.113

Tekin, N., Aslan, O., & Yilmaz, S. (2016).

Research Trends on Socioscientific

Issues: A Content Analysis of

Publications in Selected Science

Education Journals. Journal of Education

and Training Studies, 4(9), 16–24.

https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1572




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v4i2.6528

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id

 

Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu

 

  Creative Commons License
IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License