Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Understanding of Model Representation: The Case of Static Electricity

Rifat Shafwatul Anam, Rendi Restiana Sukardi, Monika Handayani, Roseleena Anantanukulwong, Titiyaka Jajuri

Abstract


This study aimed to assess the comprehension levels of prospective primary school teachers regarding verbal and visual representation models of static electricity. A survey was conducted involving 110 prospective teachers from West Java Province, selected through purposive sampling. Participants were categorized based on their secondary school study programs and gender. The study utilized a five-tier test as the instrument for data collection, with responses analyzed using descriptive statistics. Verbal and visual responses were categorized into several levels. Analysis revealed that the majority of both verbal and visual responses fell into the lack of knowledge, misconception, unidentified categories. These findings highlight the inadequate understanding of static electricity concepts among prospective primary school teachers, which may contribute to students' difficulties. Differences in educational background and gender did not significantly influence the comprehension levels in either verbal or visual representations of static electricity concepts. This provides insight into the fact that the topic of static electricity, though often regarded as straightforward and revisited at various educational stages from primary to secondary school, remains a source of widespread misunderstanding and error. The study underscores the critical need for targeted interventions in teacher education programs to enhance understanding and effective teaching of scientific concepts like static electricity at the primary school level.


Keywords


static electricity, five-tier test, visual representation, verbal representation, gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Widodo, A. (2023). The Use of the Constructivist Teaching Sequence (CTS) to Facilitate Changes in the Visual Representations of Fifth-Grade Elementary School Students: A Case Study on Teaching Heat Convection Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10358-x

Archila, P. A. (2020). Introducing Undergraduates to the Nature of Science Through the Co-construction of Evolutionary Trees Evidence from a University Biology Course. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 1917–1942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9758-z

Atakan, M., & Akçay, B. (2024). Representation of Changes about Nature of Science in Turkish Middle School Science Textbooks. Science & Education, 33(3), 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00403-6

Barth-Cohen, L., Dobie, T. E., Gutiérrez, J. F., Carlsruh, R., & Greenberg, K. (2024). Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Knowledge Resources for Blending Arguments and Representations in Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(4), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2283662

Campos, E., Zuza, K., Guisasola, J., & Zavala, G. (2023). Recognition and conversion of electric field representations: The case of electric field lines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020117

Fricke, K., & Reinisch, B. (2023). Evaluation of Nature of Science Representations in Biology School Textbooks Based on a Differentiated Family Resemblance Approach. Science & Education, 32(5), 1583–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00444-5

Ivanjek, L., Morris, L., Schubatzky, T., Hopf, M., Burde, J.-P., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Dopatka, L., Spatz, V., & Wilhelm, T. (2021). Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020123

Kapici, H. O. (2023). From Symbolic Representation to Submicroscopic One: Preservice Science Teachers’ Struggle with Chemical Representation Levels in Chemistry. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3122

Koca, N. O. (2022). Assessing the concepts of electricity and magnetism of science and engineering students. Physics Education, 57(4), 045026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac57bd

Lestari, I. N. M., Suyana, I., & Jauhari, A. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN ELECTRICITY CONCEPT TEST BERFORMAT FOUR-TIER TEST. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i1.10943

Matta, C. (2014). Scientific Representation and Science Learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.989900

Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2019). Teaching Electric Circuits: Teachers’ Perceptions and Learners’ Misconceptions. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5

Nitz, S., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2014). Survey of classroom use of representations: Development, field test and multilevel analysis. Learning Environments Research, 17(3), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9166-x

Onder-Celikkanli, N., & Tan, M. (2022). Determining Turkish high school students’ misconceptions about electric charge imbalance by using a four-tier misconception test. Physics Education, 57(5), 055010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac68c1

Pierson, A. E., Keifert, D. T., Lee, S. J., Henrie, A., Johnson, H. J., & Enyedy, N. (2023). Multiple Representations in Elementary Science: Building Shared Understanding while Leveraging Students’ Diverse Ideas and Practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(7), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2143612

Saputro, D. E., Sarwanto, S., Sukarmin, S., & Ratnasari, D. (2018). Students’ conceptions analysis on several electricity concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012043

Sengupta, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Learning Electricity with NIELS: Thinking with Electrons and Thinking in Levels. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9144-z

Suparman, A. R., Rohaeti, E., & Wening, S. (2024). Development of Computer-Based Chemical Five-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments: A Generalized Partial Credit Model. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2024.170108

Taban, T., & Kiray, S. A. (2022). Determination of Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions on Liquid Pressure with Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1791–1811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10224-8

Türkoguz, S. (2020). Investigation of Three-Tier Diagnostic and Multiple Choice Tests on Chemistry Concepts with Response Change Behaviour. International Education Studies, 13(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n9p10

Volkwyn, T. S., Airey, J., Gregorcic, B., & Linder, C. (2020). Developing representational competence: Linking real-world motion to physics concepts through graphs. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750670




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v7i1.5009

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id

 

Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu

 

  Creative Commons License
IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License