Email this article 
Students Understanding of Science in Using the Cognitive Thinking Skills Method With Online Learning as A Solution for Speaking Skills in The Era of Digital Technology
Abstract
The research examines the cognition of Foreign English (EFL) students using the Cognitive Thinking Skills method using online media as a solution for speaking skills in the digital era. The research method uses a mix method, namely: a sample of 20 students uses quantitative data analysis techniques to calculate validity and reliability, while qualitative data is analyzed based on Huberman and Miles' theory, namely collecting, reducing, verifying and displaying. The research results showed that students gave positive responses, learning felt easy and they were confident in practicing English with online media so that the development of students' cognition using the Cognitive Thinking Skill method was more adaptable and flexible. Questionnaire with a Likert scale, validity and reliability are calculated statistically: 45 items are tried out into 20 valid items, then whether the items are valid or not use the significance value (P-value) provided that if the significance value is < 0.05 then the item is valid and if significance value > 0.05 then the item is invalid. Cronbach's Alpha is significant at 0.758 > 0.21, meaning the data can be concluded to be reliable. The questionnaire instrument contains aspects of student cognition using the Cognitive Thinking Skills Method with three indicators, namely: thinking, judgment and decision. The percentage shows 45% of students gave a positive response. 25% of the total respondents to the online speaking class were in the very positive category and another 35% chose neutral. Percentage data can provide evidence that cognitive skills are a complex function of the human brain that involves aspects of memory, both short-term and long-term, attention, planning, and reasoning and strategies in a person's thinking.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amy Lawson Moore,Terissa Miller and., et all (2019). Comparing Two Methods of Delivering ThinkRx Cognitive Training to Children Ages 8–14: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Equivalency’, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3, pp. 261–270. Available at: https://doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s41465-018-0094-z.
Borg, S. (2022). Review article Teacher cognition in language teaching : A review of research on what language teachers think , know , believe , and do’, pp. 81–109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903.
Chang, CC., Yang, ST. (2023). Interactive effects of scaffolding digital game-based learning and cognitive style on adult learners’ emotion, cognitive load and learning performance’, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 20(20 March 2023), p. 16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00385-7.
CNN Indonesia (2022). Warga RI Tak Fasih Berbahasa Inggris, Posisi ke-81 dari 111 Negara’, CNN Indonesia.
Cynthia S. Sunal and Vivian H. Wright (2012). Online Learning. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning.’, in. Boston, MA.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Daniel Weitekamp and Kenneth Koedinger (2023). Computational Models of Learning: Deepening Care and Carefulness in AI in Education’, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education [Preprint], (30 June 2023). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_2.
Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Wanying Luo, et all (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3.
Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M. & Nyholm, M (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: a connectivism theory approach’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w.
Ekene Francis Okagbue and Tosin Yinka Akintunde, et all. (2023). A comprehensive overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in education pedagogy: 21 Years (2000–2021) of research indexed in the scopus database’, Social Sciences & Humanities, 8(1).
Erin Tharalson,Michelle Morgan. et all (2023). Innovative Digital Pedagogy: Adaptive Learning Platform Integration in Nurse Practitioner Curriculum’, The Journal for Nurse Practitioners The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 19(10 november).
Fenglin Jia,Daner Sun and Chee-kit Looi (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Science Education (2013–2023): Research Trends in Ten Years’, Journal of Science Education and Technology [Preprint], (0ktober 2023). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6.
Geoffrey Broughton, et.al (2020). Teaching English as a Foreign Language’, in. New York: Routledge, p. 6.
Goldberg, B and Robson, R (2023.) AI to Support Guided Experiential Learning’, Book cover Book cover International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, p. 30 June 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_16.
Ina Blau, Tamar Shamir-Inbal and Orit Avdiel (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?’, The Internet and Higher Education, 45.
Isaac, O. et al. (2019). Online learning usage within Yemeni higher education: The role of compatibility and task-technology fit as mediating variables in the IS success model’, Computers and Education, 136(November 2017), pp. 113–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.012.
Isotani,S , Bittencourt, I., G and Walker, E (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Educational Policy: Bridging Research and Practice’, Book cover Book cover International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education [Preprint], (30 June 2023). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_9.
Jane Yeomans (2023). Cognitive Thinking Skills’, Structural learning, Cmbridge, UK.
John W. Creswel and J. David Creswe (2018) ‘Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches’, in. in the United States of A: ition. | Los Angeles.
Kumar, A. et al. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in health professional education: a mixed methods study protocol’, BMC Medical Education, 21(1), pp. 1–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02871-w.
Lijuan Zhang (2022). The Transformation and Upgrading of English Teaching Modernization under the Background of Information Technolog’, MATEC Web of Conferences [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/DOI:10.1051/matecconf/202235901025.
Ludovico Bullini Orlandi (2016). Organizational capabilities in the digital era: Reframing strategic orientation’, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, Vol. 1.(Issue 3.), pp. 156–161.
Miri Barak and Carmella Shahab (2022). The Conceptualization of Critical Thinking: Toward a Culturally Inclusive Framework for Technology-Enhanced Instruction in Higher Education’, Journal of Science Education and Technology [Preprint], (20 September 2022). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09999-4.
Murat Doğan Şahin1*, Gökhan Öztürk (2019). Mixed method research: Theoretical foundations, designs and its use in educational research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research’, International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6, Number 2, pp. 301–310.
ÖZTÜRK, M. (2021). Teacher cognition: A powerful phenomenon developing and governing habits of teaching’, Turkish Journal of Education, 10(2), pp. 178–194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.801945.
Parthasarathy Pk , Amit Mittal and Arun Aggarwal (2023). Literature Review: Learning Through Game-Based Technology Enhances Cognitive Skills’, International Journal of Professional Business [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/DOI:10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1415.
Rajneesh Chowdhury (2023). Holistic Flexibility for Deploying Systems Thinking as a Cognitive Skil’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 36(5). Available at: https://doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s11213-022-09626-8.
Ramakrishnan Vivek and Sathiyakumar AICPA CA CPA and CFA Chandrakumar (2023). A critical review of the mixed method application and its criticism. Social A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE MIXED METHOD APPLICATION AND ITS CRITICISM’, Social Work and Education, 10, pp. 242–253. Available at: https://doi.org/DOI:10.25128/2520-6230.23.2.8.
Ramesh Kumar Chaturvedi,Vishal Verma, Kushendra Mishra (2022). Differential effect of pre and post cognitive skills training program: a study on healthy young children’, Smart Learn. Environ, 9(17 January 2022), p. 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00185-4.
Sadaf Taimur and Motoharu Onuki (2022). Design thinking as digital transformative pedagogy in higher sustainability education: Cases from Japan and Germany’, International Journal of Educational Research, 144.
Shengnan Wang, Aaron Wilson., et all (2023). Opportunities to learn literacy in digital classrooms in New Zealand primary schools: Does class achievement level make a difference?’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 130.
Simone M. Ritter and Nel Mostert (2017). Enhancement of Creative Thinking Skills Using a Cognitive-Based Creativity Training’, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3.
Sugiyono (2018). Metode Penelitiam Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta CV.
Wasana Karunarathne & Angelito Calma (2023). Assessing creative thinking skills in higher education: deficits and improvements’, Studies in Higher Education [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2225532.
Ya-Yu Cloudia Ho (2020). Communicative language teaching and English as a foreign language undergraduates’ communicative competence in Tourism English’, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27.
Yehudit Judy Dori and Rea Lavi (2023). Teaching and Assessing Thinking Skills and Applying Educational Technologies in Higher Education’, Journal of Science Education and Technology [Preprint], (8 agustus 2023). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10072-x.
Yujie Wei, Jiaxin Ye and et all (2023). Online Prototype Learning for Online Continual Learning’, Reaserch gate [Preprint].
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v6i1.2388
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education
ijis.edu@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Lantai 2 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah Kel. Pagar Dewa Kec. Selebar Kota Bengkulu
IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education This is published by UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with the permission below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
