slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor
Editorial Policies Al-Intaj: Jurnal EKonomi dan Perbankan Syariah

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus

Al Intaj : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah is designed to provide a forum for researchers who focus on Islamic economics and banking, covering current issues in Islamic economics and banking, Islamic philanthropy, and Islamic finance.

Scope

The scope of this journal includes:

1. Islamic Economic 
2. Islamic Accounting
3. Islamic Philanthropy
4. Islamic Bussines Ethic
5. Islamic Insurance 
6. Islamic Microfinance
7. Islamic Capital market
8. Sharia Financial Banking.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Every paper submitted to Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah for publication must go through a peer review process. Peer review in this journal is an evaluation of a submitted paper by two or more individuals competence to the article. It aims to determine the eligibility of an academic paper for publication. The peer review method is used to maintain quality standards and provide credibility for papers. The peer review process in Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah is carried out through 9 steps with the following description:

  1. Paper Submission The corresponding author or authors submitting the paper submit the paper to the journal. This is done through an online system supported by the Open Journal System (OJS).
  2. Editorial Assessment Submitted manuscripts will be assessed first by the editors of Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah. The editors check whether the paper fits the focus and scope of the Journal. The composition and organization of the paper is evaluated based on the journal's Author Guidelines to ensure that the paper includes the required sections and language style. In addition, an assessment of the minimum quality required for publication is initiated at this stage, including an assessment of whether there are any major methodological flaws. Any manuscript that passes this stage will be checked by Turnitin to measure the similarity index leading to plagiarism before being reviewed by the reviewers.
  3. Assessment by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief checks whether the manuscript is appropriate for the journal, original enough, interesting, and significant enough to be published. Otherwise, the manuscript may be rejected without further review.
  4. Invitation to Reviewers The managing editor sends invitations to individuals he/she believes would be appropriate reviewers (also known as referees) based on expertise, closeness of research interests, and no conflict of interest considerations. The peer review process in Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah involves a community of experts who are qualified and capable of conducting an impartial review. This impartiality is also maintained by the double-blind peer review used in this journal. This means that the reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and conversely, the authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. Manuscripts are sent to reviewers anonymously.
  5. Response to Invitations Potential reviewers weigh the invitation against their expertise, conflicts of interest, and time availability. They then decide to accept or decline. In the invitation letter, the editor may ask the prospective reviewer to suggest an alternative reviewer, if he or she declines to review.
  6. The Reviewer allocates time to read the manuscript several times. The first reading is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the work without doing any further work. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to create a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept, or reject it, or with a request for revision (usually marked as major or minor) before reconsideration.
  7. Journal Evaluates Reviews The Editor-in-Chief and handling editor will consider all returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely between the two reviewers, the editor-in-charge may invite additional reviewers for additional opinions before making a decision.
  8. Decision Communicated The editor emails the decision to the author including relevant reviewer comments. Reviewers' comments are sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take necessary actions and responses. At this point, reviewers are also sent an email or letter informing them of the outcome of their review.
  9. Final Steps If accepted, the manuscript will be sent to editing. Suppose the article is rejected or sent back to the author for major or minor revisions. In this case, the handling editor will include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. The author should make corrections and revise the manuscript according to the comments and instructions from the reviewers.

Once the revisions have been made, the author should resubmit the revised paper to the editor.
If the manuscript is sent back for revision, the reviewers will accept the revised version, unless they do not wish to participate further. However, if only minor changes are requested, this follow-up review can be done by the handling editor. If the editor is happy with the revised paper, it will be accepted. Accepted papers will be published online and all are freely available as downloadable pdf files.

 

Publication Frequency

Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah published every March, and September annually with munimum 5 articles per issues

 

Open Access Policy

Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah is committed to promoting the broadest possible access to the published research and ensuring that it can be freely read, downloaded, copied, distributed, printed, searched, or linked to in full text, used as data for software, or utilised for any other lawful purpose without financial, legal, or technical barriers. 

All articles publish in Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY SA 4.0). This licence allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. 

Key Points of Our Open Access Policy: 

  1. Immediate Open Access: All articles are freely available to the public immediately upon publication, without any embargo period. 
  2. Author Rights: Authors retain copyright to their work by publishing in Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, authors grant the journal the right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
  3. Reuse and Redistribution: Articles can be reused and redistributed for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original work, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  4. Accesibility: we ensure that the full text of all published articles is available in pdf format to the enhance eccessibility and ease of use. 
  5. Transparency: Licensing terms are clearly indicated on the website and within the full text of all published articles. This includes a link to the reative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License terms.
  6. No Registration Required: Readers are not required to register to access any part of the journal content.

Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah adheres to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing as outlined by COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, dan WAME. Our commitment ensures that editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and that the journal maintains the highest ethical publishing standards. 

 

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and taking all possible actions against publication malpractice. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among other things, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is not acceptable, and Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. The author submitting the article: confirms that the content of the manuscript is original. In addition, the author submitting the manuscript also states that the manuscript has not been previously published in any language, either in whole or in part, and is not being submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, in Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah must be fully committed to good publication practices and accept responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set out by the COPE Code of Ethics for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines at http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines 

 

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Al-Intaj is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society. 

 

Faculty of Economics and Bisnis Islam UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu as publisher of Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication decisions

The editor of Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Plagiarism Policy

AL-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in AL-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah. Will use Plagiarisme Turnitin originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 25% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 25% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.

 

Definition:

Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

 

Policy:

Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

 

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

 

When plagiarism is identified, the Editor in Chief responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

 

Level of Plagiarism

1. Minor: A short section of another article is plagiarized without any significant data or idea taken from the other paper

Action: A warning is given to the authors and a request to change the text and properly cite the original article is made.

2. Intermediate: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized without proper citation to the original paper

Action: The submitted article is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for one year