slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor
Editorial Policies Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

FOCUS

 

This journal aims to disseminate scholarly works related to research and discussions in the field of Contextualized Islamic Law, contributing to an enhanced understanding of Islamic law. Through the publication of articles and research reports, it seeks to advance knowledge and enrich the discourse on Islamic law.

 

SCOPE

 

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani welcomes research contributions from scholars, academics, and practitioners. Specifically, the journal invites papers addressing the following general topics:

 

    Contextualized Islamic Family Law

    Contextualized Islamic Criminal Law

    Contextualized Islamic Economic Law

    Contextualized Islamic Politics

    Contextualized Islamic Judicial System

    Contextualized Legal Aid in Islam

    Contextualized Islamic Jurisprudence

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum Ekonomi dan Kegamaan will undergo a selection and assessment process by the Board of Editors to ensure their accordance with the writing guideline, focus, and scope, and that they are of excellent academic quality.  The manuscripts will be reviewed using the “double-blind peer review” method in which case neither authors nor reviewers know each other’s identities.

Desk Review. At the desk review stage, manuscripts will be examined to ensure that they have met the writing guideline, focus, and scope with excellent academic quality. If they do not meet the conditions, the author will be given the opportunity to revise their manuscript according to the given criteria. However, there is also the possibility that the manuscript will be directly rejected. 

Peer review. When the manuscript has passed the desk review stage, it will then be delivered to two reviewers who are experts in the field of the submitted manuscript. The review process will be done within four weeks. Manuscripts that did not successfully pass the desk review process will not proceed to this stage. 

Reviewer’s decision. The reviewers will provide the following recommendations: 

  1. Accepted; means that the manuscript is acceptable for publication;
  2. Accepted with minor revisions; means that the manuscript is acceptable for publication once it is revised in response to the reviewers’ concerns;
  3. Accepted with major revisions; means that substantive inadequacies in the manuscript, such as data analysis, the main theory used, and rewriting of paragraphs, need to be revised;
  4. Rejected; means that the manuscript is not acceptable for publication or the given reviews relate to very basic issues.

The reviewer’s decision will be considered by the Board of Editors to determine the ensuing process of the manuscript. 

Revision Stage. Once the manuscript has been received with notations of minor or major revisions, it will be returned to the author with a review summary form. For manuscripts accepted with major revisions, authors are allotted four weeks to revise. Whereas for manuscripts accepted with minor revisions, two weeks is allotted for revision. 

Final decision. At this stage, the manuscript will be re-evaluated by the Board of Editors to ensure that the author has revised in response to the reviewers’ concerns. In this final decision, the manuscript may still be rejected if the author did not seriously conduct the revisions necessary. 

Proofread. Once the manuscript has been deemed acceptable by the Board of Editors, it will undergo a proofreading process to maintain linguistic quality. 

Publication confirmation. At this stage, the final layout of the manuscript will be resent to the author to ensure that the content is in accordance with the author’s writing. At this stage, the author may revise any typographical error found in the final manuscript. Once confirmation from the author is given, the Editorial Secretary will process the manuscript for online publication on the website as well as a print publication.

Publication confirmation. At this stage, the final layout of the manuscript will be resent to the author to ensure that the content is in accordance with the author’s writing. At this stage, the author may revise any typographical error found in the final manuscript. Once confirmation from the author is given, the Editorial Secretary will process the manuscript for online publication on the website as well as a print publication.

 

Publication Frequency

Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan publishes twice a year, in April and October. Journal items may be published collectively as part of an issue with its own Table of Contents or individually as soon as they are ready, by adding them to the "current" volume's Table of Contents. For more information about the publication system and frequency, please refer to the "About the Journal" section.

 

Open Access Policy

  • Open Access Policy

     

    This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge

    Step 1: Publication and Authorship

    • All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two national or international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. Reviewers are being selected by Managing Editor and Editor-in-Chief. The author also can propose reviewers for some journals and article types.
    • The factors that are taken into account in the review are relevance, originality, readability, statistical validity, and language.
    • The possible decisions include acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection.
    • If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
    • Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
    • The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
    • No research can be included in more than one publication, whether within the same journal or in another journal.

    Step 2: Authors’ Responsibilities

    • Authors must certify that their manuscript is their original work.
    • Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere, or even submitted and reviewed in another journal.
    • Authors must participate in the peer review process and follow the comments.
    • Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
    • All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research. The level of their contribution also must be defined in the “Authors’ Contributions” section of the article.
    • Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
    • Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
    • Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscripts.
    • Authors must report any errors they discover in their published papers to the Editors.
    • Authors must not use irrelevant sources that may help other researches/journals.
    • Authors cannot withdraw their articles within the review process or after submission, or they must pay the penalty defined by the publisher.

    Step 3: Peer Review/Responsibility for the Reviewers

    • Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
    • Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author. No self-knowledge of the author(s) must affect their comments and decision.
    • Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments in 400 to 800 words.
    • Reviewers may identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
    • Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
    • Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

    Step 4: Editorial Responsibilities

    • Editors (Managing Editor or Editor-in-Chief) have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
    • Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
    • Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
    • Editors should make corrections when needed.
    • Editors should base their decisions solely on the paper's importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the publication’s scope.
    • Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
    • Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
    • Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
    • Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
    • Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
    • Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions; they should have proof of misconduct.
    • Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers, and board members.
    • Editors must not change their decision after submitting a decision (especially after rejection or acceptance) unless they have a serious reason.

    Step 5: Publishing Ethics Issues

    • All editorial members, reviewers, and authors must confirm and obey the rules defined by COPE.
    • The corresponding author is the main owner of the article so she/he can withdraw the article when it is incomplete (before entering the review process or when a revision is asked for).
    • Authors cannot make major changes in the article after acceptance without a serious reason.
    • All editorial members and authors must will to publish any kind of corrections honestly and completely.
    • Any notes of plagiarism, fraudulent data, or any other kinds of fraud must be reported completely to COPE.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu . This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed  Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.

Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editors of the Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Plagiarism Policies

Plagiarism Check

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan has a zero-tolerance for plagiarism and unethical behaviour with respect to publishing. Authors must ensure their paper is of the highest standard and that attributions and citations are accurate and the paper is original in its entirety. All papers are systemically reviewed on submission and any detections mean an immediate rejection. The journal applies plagiarism-detection to each submitted manuscript. Plagiarism screening will be conducted by Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani Editors uses Turnitin to track the level of similarities and the author will be well-informed about the result of similarities-checking. 

Plagiarism occurs when an author takes ideas, information, or words from another source without proper credit to the source. Even when it occurs unintentionally, plagiarism is still a serious academic violation and unacceptable in international academic publications. When the author learns specific information (a name, date, place, statistical number, or other detailed information) from a specific source, a citation is required. (This is only forgiven in cases of general knowledge, where the data is readily available in more than five sources or is common knowledge, e.g., the fact that Indonesia is the most populous Muslim country in the world.) When the author takes an idea from another author, a citation is required—even if the author then develops the idea further. This might be an idea about how to interpret the data, either what methodology to use or what conclusion to draw. It might be an idea about broad developments in a field or general information. Regardless of the idea, the authors should cite their sources. In cases where the author develops the idea further, it is still necessary to cite the original source of the idea, and then in a subsequent sentence, the author can explain her or his more developed idea. When the author takes words from another author, citation and quotation marks are required. Whenever four or more consecutive words are identical to a source that the author has read, the author must use quotation marks to denote the use of another author’s original words; just a citation is no longer enough.

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan takes academic integrity very seriously, and the editors reserve the right to withdraw acceptance from a paper found to violate any of the standards set out above. The journal's editors (in conjunction with the publisher, the reviewer, ethics commission, and/or society) will take responsive measures when ethical concerns are raised with regard to a submitted manuscript or published paper. Every reported act of unethical publishing behaviour will be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication. The editors follow the COPE Flowcharts when dealing with cases of suspected misconduct.

In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication, or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editors and members of editorial board [if necessary ethics commision], will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum, clarification or, in the most severe case, the retraction of the affected work. Together with the editors, the publisher shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, and under no circumstances encourage such misconduct or knowingly allow such misconduct to occur.

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan takes academic integrity very seriously, and the editors reserve the right to withdraw acceptance from a paper found to violate any of the standards set out above. For further information, potential authors can contact the editorial office at https://ejournal.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/ or jurnal_mizani@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id

 

References Management

Citation and bibliography writing are done using Zotero and Mendeley software

 

Article Processing Charge

Manuscript submission, Rp0.
Publication, $600

 

Authorship and Contributorship

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan adheres to the principles of transparency and best practices in scholarly publishing as set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA). This policy outlines the requirements for authorship and contributorship, ensuring clear and unambiguous attribution of contributions to published works. As an open-access journal practicing the CC-BY-SA license, the authors retain the copyright of their articles while granting broad permissions for distribution and reuse. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Criteria for Authorship

Authorship of a scholarly article in Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan should be based on substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. To be considered an author, individuals must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Substantial Contributions: Authors are expected to make significant contributions to the intellectual content of the article, such as the conception or design of the study, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and drafting or revising the manuscript for important intellectual content.
  2. Approval of Final Version: All authors should approve the final version of the article and agree to take responsibility for its content.
  3. Accountability: Authors must be able to explain and defend the research findings in public forums if required.

Contributorship Statement

To promote transparency and avoid misunderstandings, Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan might asked a contributorship statement with the manuscript submitted to Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan. The statement should explicitly identify the contributions of each author to the research. This statement will not be published, however, it should accurately reflect the individual roles played by each author.

Dispute Resolution

In cases of disagreements or disputes regarding authorship, the editorial board of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will follow a structured process to investigate and resolve the matter. The concerned parties will be asked to provide evidence of their contributions to the research. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan may also seek guidance from COPE or other relevant organizations to ensure fair and unbiased resolution. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will not get involved nor held liable for personal disputes between authors.

Changes in Authorship

Requests for adding, deleting, or rearranging authors after manuscript submission to Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will be considered only in exceptional circumstances. Such requests must be supported by a written explanation from all authors involved, providing a detailed account of the reasons for the change. The editorial board of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will carefully evaluate the request and may consult the journal's advisors and check with COPE's guidance if necessary.

Honorary and Ghost Authorship

Honorary authorship (gift authorship) and ghost authorship (uncredited contributions) are not acceptable practices in Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan. Any individual who has made only minor contributions to the research or the article must be acknowledged appropriately in the acknowledgment section, but not listed as an author. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will actively work to prevent and address cases of honorary and ghost authorship.

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation of their research in their submissions to Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan. Conflicts of interest may include financial interests, affiliations, or personal relationships that could compromise the impartiality and credibility of the work. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan encourages full transparency in these disclosures.

Compliance with Ethical Guidelines

Authors must adhere to the ethical guidelines of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan and the prevailing ethical standards in the field of research. This includes obtaining appropriate permissions for the use of copyrighted materials, obtaining informed consent from human subjects, and ensuring the ethical treatment of animals in research.

Review of Authorship Policy

The authorship policy of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will be periodically reviewed and updated as necessary to align with the evolving practices in scholarly publishing and the recommendations of relevant organizations. Any revisions to this policy will be communicated to authors and made publicly available on the Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan website.

 

 

Complaints and appeals

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is committed to providing a fair and transparent process for handling complaints and appeals. This policy outlines the procedures for submitting complaints against the journal, its staff, editorial board, or publisher, as well as the process for handling appeals. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan aims to ensure that all complaints are addressed promptly, impartially, and with utmost consideration to preserve the integrity of its scholarly publications. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Types of Complaints

Complaints may include, but are not limited to, the following issues:

  • Allegations of research misconduct or ethical violations in published articles.
  • Claims of bias or unfair treatment by the editorial board or journal staff.
  • Disputes related to the peer-review process.
  • Accusations of copyright infringement or plagiarism.
  • Concerns about conflicts of interest or undisclosed competing interests.

Submitting a Complaint

Authors, reviewers, readers, or any concerned individuals can submit a complaint regarding any aspect of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan's operations through our contact's email. Please include the complainant's contact information, a detailed description of the complaint, and any supporting evidence or documentation in submitting your complaint.

Confidentiality and Anonymity

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan recognizes the importance of protecting the confidentiality and anonymity of both the complainant and the individuals involved in the complaint investigation. Complaints will be handled in strict confidence, and personal information will only be shared with individuals directly involved in the investigation.

Initial Assessment

Upon receiving a complaint, the editorial office of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will conduct an initial assessment to determine the validity and seriousness of the issues raised. If the complaint falls outside the scope of this policy, the complainant will be informed and, if possible, directed to the appropriate authority.

Investigation Process

If the complaint is deemed valid and falls within the scope of this policy, the editorial board of Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will initiate a thorough investigation. The investigation may involve gathering additional information, consulting relevant parties, and examining any pertinent documentation.

Involvement of Editorial Board and Publisher

If the complaint involves the editorial board or publisher, Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will take appropriate steps to ensure that those individuals are not involved in the investigation process to maintain impartiality.

Resolution and Communication

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will strive to resolve the complaint as expeditiously as possible. Once the investigation is complete, the complainant will be notified of the outcome and any actions taken in response to the complaint.

Appeals

If the complainant is dissatisfied with the outcome of the initial investigation, they may submit an appeal. The appeal should clearly state the reasons for challenging the previous decision and provide any additional evidence or information.

Appeals Handling

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will establish an independent appeals committee comprising individuals not previously involved in the complaint investigation. The committee will review the appeal and conduct a fair and unbiased reassessment of the case.

Final Decision

The decision of the appeals committee will be final, and Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will communicate the outcome to the complainant, providing a comprehensive explanation of the decision.

Public Transparency

To maintain transparency and accountability, Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will keep a record of all complaints received, including their resolution and any actions taken. This anonymized record will be made publicly available on the journal's website, subject to privacy and confidentiality considerations.

Review of Complaints and Appeals Policy

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will periodically review and update this policy to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with best practices. Any revisions to this policy will be promptly communicated to stakeholders and published on Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan's website.

 

Data and Reproducibility

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is committed to promoting transparency and scientific rigor in scholarly research. This policy outlines the journal's approach to data availability and encourages the use of reporting guidelines and registration of clinical trials and other study designs according to standard practices in their discipline should this kind of data are exist/used in the manuscripts. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Data Availability

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan encourages authors to make all data underlying their research findings fully available and accessible to readers. Authors should provide detailed information about the data collection process, methodology, and analysis to allow for reproducibility and verification of the results. In certain cases, jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan would request access to the raw data if needed.

For Quantitative Research:

Authors should deposit datasets in reputable data repositories or provide a link to the data in the article. If data cannot be made publicly available due to ethical or legal constraints, authors should clearly explain the reasons and provide a mechanism for jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan and its readers to request access to the data.

For Qualitative Research:

Authors should provide detailed descriptions of the data sources and methods used in the research. They should also consider providing excerpts or representative examples of data to support the research findings.

Reporting Guidelines

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan encourages authors to adhere to relevant reporting guidelines specific to their study design. Following these guidelines enhances the clarity and completeness of research reporting, making it easier for readers, reviewers, and editors to evaluate the research and facilitating the reproducibility of the study.

Clinical Trial Registration

For clinical trials and other study designs that involve human participants, authors should register their studies in appropriate clinical trial registries before participant enrollment. jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan follows the principles outlined in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and supports the registration of clinical trials according to international standards.

Reproducibility and Verification

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan values the importance of reproducibility in research. Authors should provide sufficient details in their manuscripts, including the methodology, protocols, and analytical approaches, to enable other researchers to reproduce the study findings.

Data Citation

Authors should properly cite the datasets and sources used in their research to give appropriate credit and facilitate data attribution. Data citations should be included in the reference list following standard citation formats.

Compliance Check

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan's editorial board and peer reviewers will assess the adherence to this data and reproducibility policy during the manuscript evaluation process. Authors may be asked to provide additional information or clarifications regarding data availability and reporting guidelines.

Review of the Policy

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will periodically review and update this policy to align with evolving best practices in data sharing, reporting, and reproducibility. Any revisions to this policy will be communicated to authors and made publicly available on the journal's website.

 

Ethical Oversight

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. This policy encompasses various aspects of ethical oversight to ensure the protection of participants, animals, and confidential data, as well as the ethical conduct of business and marketing practices. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Consent to Publication

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan requires authors to obtain appropriate consent from all individuals or entities mentioned in the research or involved in the study. This includes consent to publish identifiable information, images, or other personally identifiable data. Authors should provide documentation of consent when submitting their manuscripts.

Publication on Vulnerable Populations

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is sensitive to research involving vulnerable populations, such as children, elderly individuals, mentally challenged individuals, or other marginalized groups. Authors should adhere to ethical guidelines when conducting research on such populations and should provide a clear justification for the inclusion of vulnerable participants.

Ethical Conduct of Research Using Animals

If the research involves the use of animals, authors must comply with all relevant ethical guidelines and regulations for animal research. Authors should clearly state in their manuscript that the study received ethical approval from the appropriate animal ethics committee or institutional review board.

Ethical Conduct of Research Using Human Subjects

For research involving human subjects, authors must obtain informed consent from all participants and follow relevant ethical guidelines, such as the Declaration of Helsinki or applicable national guidelines. The research protocol should receive approval from the institutional review board or ethics committee.

Handling Confidential Data

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan ensures the confidentiality and security of any confidential data provided during the submission and review process. Reviewers and editorial staff are required to treat all submitted materials with confidentiality and must not disclose any information regarding the submitted manuscripts to any unauthorized individuals.

Ethical Business/Marketing Practices

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is committed to ethical business and marketing practices. The journal does not engage in any practices that may compromise the integrity of the publishing process or mislead authors or readers. jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan does not support any form of predatory publishing, non-standards, or unethical marketing strategies.

Compliance and Reporting

Authors should comply with all aspects of this ethical oversight policy and provide full disclosure of any potential ethical concerns during the submission process. Failure to adhere to ethical guidelines may result in rejection or retraction of the manuscript, as well as other appropriate actions.

Review of the Policy

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will periodically review and update this policy to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with best ethical practices. Any revisions to this policy will be communicated to authors and made publicly available on the journal's website.

 

Intellectual Property

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan aims to maintain the highest standards of intellectual property protection and ethical publishing practices. This policy outlines the journal's guidelines on copyright, publishing licenses, costs associated with publishing, prepublication considerations, plagiarism, and redundant/overlapping publication. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Copyright and Publishing Licenses

Authors who submit their work to jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan retain copyright of their articles while granting the journal the non-exclusive right to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC-BY-NC-SA) license. This license allows readers to share and adapt the work non-commercially, provided proper attribution is given and any resulting derivative works are distributed under the same license.

Publication Costs

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaanfollows an open access model that allows unrestricted access to its content. There is no costs of publication, the journal will not charge article processing fees. 

Prepublication Considerations

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaanconsiders manuscripts that have not been published elsewhere. Prepublication in any form, including preprint servers, personal websites, or institutional repositories, may preclude consideration by the journal. However, presenting research findings at conferences or posting preprints on preprint servers will not necessarily disqualify the manuscript, provided that it does not constitute prior formal publication nor identical documents.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism, in any form, is strictly prohibited by jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan. Authors must ensure that their submitted work is original and properly cited, giving appropriate credit to the sources. The editorial board employs plagiarism detection software (Turnitin) to identify any instances of potential plagiarism during the review process. The manuscript with a similarity score of more than 25% will be automatically rejected.

Redundant/Overlapping Publication

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaandoes not consider manuscripts that substantially overlap with previously published works. Authors should not submit a manuscript that has been published, accepted for publication, or is under review elsewhere. Republishing a previously published work without proper acknowledgment or justification will be considered redundant publication and is not allowed.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Authors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could be perceived to influence the research, its analysis, or interpretation. Such conflicts may include financial interests, affiliations, or personal relationships that could compromise the impartiality and credibility of the work. jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaanencourages full transparency in these disclosures.

Review of the Policy

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will periodically review and update this policy to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with best practices in intellectual property protection and ethical publishing. Any revisions to this policy will be communicated to authors and made publicly available on the journal's website.

 

Post-Publication Discussions and Corrections

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaanencourages open discussions and transparency in scholarly publishing. This policy outlines the journal's commitment to facilitating post-publication debates and mechanisms for correcting, revising, or retracting articles after publication to maintain the integrity and accuracy of its content. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Post-publication Discussions

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan welcomes post-publication discussions on published articles. Authors, readers, and the scientific community are encouraged to engage in constructive and evidence-based debates on the content and findings of published works. The journal provides several avenues for post-publication discussions:

  • Letters to the Editor: Readers can submit letters to the editor, sharing their opinions, comments, or additional insights related to a specific article. The editorial board will consider publishing selected letters to foster a well-rounded scholarly conversation.
  • Comments on the Website: jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan does not allow nor provide facilities for readers to post comments directly on the website for security reasons. Online comments are proven to be a wide-open door to spammers and hackers. Comments are made in articles and submitted to jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan using our submission system/process to facilitate discussions and interactions.
  • External Moderated Site: The journal acknowledges the value of external moderated platforms, such as PubPeer, for scholarly discussions. Readers may also use these platforms to discuss jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan's articles and findings.

Corrections, Revisions, and Retractions

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is committed to ensuring the accuracy and reliability of published articles. If errors, inaccuracies, or significant omissions are identified after publication, the journal will implement the following measures:

Corrections:

If minor errors or typographical mistakes are identified that do not alter the scientific content, jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will issue a formal correction, clearly stating the errors and providing accurate information.

Revisions:

If substantial errors or inaccuracies are identified that affect the scientific content, the author(s) will be asked to submit a revised version of the article with the necessary corrections. The revised article will undergo editorial review and, if approved, will be published with a note indicating that it is a revised version.

Retractions:

In cases of severe misconduct, ethical violations, or fraudulent data, jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan may consider retracting an article. Retractions will be issued when there is clear evidence of unreliability or falsification of data in the published work. The retracted article will remain accessible with a prominent notice indicating that it has been retracted, providing a clear explanation for the retraction.

Compliance and Transparency

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan's editorial board, reviewers, and authors are expected to comply with the policies outlined in this information and actively participate in post-publication discussions and corrections as needed. All corrections, revisions, and retractions will be documented and publicly available on the journal's website.

Review of the Policy

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaanwill periodically review and update this policy to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with best practices in post-publication discussions and corrections. Any revisions to this policy will be communicated to authors and made publicly available on the journal's website.

 

Conflicts of interest / Competing interests

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan is committed to maintaining the highest standards of transparency and ethical conduct in scholarly publishing. This policy outlines the definitions of conflicts of interest and the processes for handling conflicts of interest for authors, reviewers, editors, journals, and publishers, whether identified before or after publication. The journal follows the Core Practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Definition of Conflicts of Interest

A conflict of interest arises when an individual or entity has financial, personal, professional, or academic relationships or interests that could influence or be perceived to influence their objectivity, integrity, or decision-making in the context of research, review, editorial, or publishing processes.

Identification of Conflicts of Interest

Authors, reviewers, editors, and others involved in the publication process must disclose all potential conflicts of interest that could be relevant to the work they are submitting, reviewing, editing, or publishing. These conflicts of interest may include, but are not limited to:

  • Financial interests: Funding sources, stock ownership, employment, consultancy, or other financial relationships related to the research.
  • Personal relationships: Close personal relationships or family ties with individuals involved in the research or publication process.
  • Academic relationships: Collaborations or academic affiliations that may influence objectivity or perceptions of bias.
  • Competing affiliations: Affiliations with competing organizations that may have conflicting interests in the research or its outcome.
  • Intellectual property: Any patents, copyrights, or intellectual property rights that could be affected by the research or publication.

Handling Conflicts of Interest

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will handle conflicts of interest with the utmost diligence and transparency.

For Authors:

Authors must disclose all potential conflicts of interest during the manuscript submission process. If a conflict of interest is identified after publication, authors should promptly notify the editorial board, and the conflict will be addressed in a transparent manner.

For Reviewers:

Reviewers are expected to decline review invitations if they have conflicts of interest that may affect their impartiality. If a reviewer becomes aware of a conflict of interest during the review process, they should immediately notify the editorial board for appropriate actions.

For Editors and Journal Staff:

Editors and journal staff involved in the review and publication process must recuse themselves from handling any submissions in which they have conflicts of interest. In case of any doubt, the editorial board will make the final decision on how to handle such cases.

For Publishers:

Publishers must have policies in place to address potential conflicts of interest within their organization. They should ensure that decisions related to editorial processes and content are not influenced by financial considerations or other competing interests.

Transparency and Disclosure

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will clearly state its policy on conflicts of interest, and relevant stakeholders will be informed of the requirements for disclosure. Conflicts of interest disclosures made by authors, reviewers, editors, and others will be published alongside the respective articles, reviews, or editorials to ensure transparency. jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will limit/prevent its editors, reviewers, and relevant stakeholder access to publication process, should they co-author articles submitted to jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan.

Review of the Policy

jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan will periodically review and update this policy to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with best practices. Any revisions to this policy will be communicated to stakeholders and made publicly available on the journal's website.

 

Errata & Corrigenda

For the purposes of this document the term editor encompasses all editor title variations and is limited to those that have final acceptance responsibility.

Changes/additions to accepted articles

All content of published articles are subject to the editorial review process, organized by and under the auspices of the editor. Should the authors wish to add to their article after acceptance, they must submit a request the editor and the new content will be reviewed.

If the new material is additional to the accepted article, it must be submitted for peer review as a new manuscript, referring back to the original;

If the new material should replace the original content of the accepted article, the editor may consider the publication of an erratum or a corrigendum.

Erratum

An erratum refers to a correction of errors introduced to the article by the publisher.

All publisher-introduced changes are highlighted to the author at the proof stage and any errors are ideally identified by the author and corrected by the publisher before final publication.

Authors who notice an error should contact the Journal Manager

 

Corrigendum

A corrigendum refers to a change to their article that the author wishes to publish at any time after acceptance. Authors should contact the editor of the journal, who will determine the impact of the change and decide on the appropriate course of action. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani will only instigate a corrigendum to a published article after receiving approval and instructions from the editor.