slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor
Editorial Policies

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Manthiq : Jurnal Filsafat Agama & Pemikiran Islam menerima artikel dan karya ilmiah tentang :

1. Filsafat Agama

2. Filsafat Islam

3. Filsafat Pendidikan

4. Filsafat Ilmu

5. Filsafat Etika

6. Filsafat Moral

7. Filsafat Komunikasi

8. Filsafat Hukum

9. Pemikiran Politik Islam

10. Pemikiran dan kajian sosial keagamaan

11. Pemikiran dan kajian sosial kebudayaan

12. Dan pemikiran kajian keagamaan sosial lainnya

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethic

Manthiq is a peer-reviewed electronic national journal, available in print and online and published two times a year. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Manthiq is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

IAIN Bengkulu as publisher of Manthiq takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the Manthiq is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.



 

Focus and Scope

Manthiq : Jurnal Filsafat Agama & Pemikiran Islam menerima artikel dan karya ilmiah tentang :

1. Filsafat Agama

2. Filsafat Islam

3. Filsafat Pendidikan

4. Filsafat Ilmu

5. Filsafat Etika

6. Filsafat Moral

7. Filsafat Komunikasi

8. Filsafat Hukum

9. Pemikiran Politik Islam

10. Pemikiran dan kajian sosial keagamaan

11. Pemikiran dan kajian sosial kebudayaan

12. Dan pemikiran kajian keagamaan sosial lainnya

 

Plagiarism Policy

Statement and Policy
Manthiq : Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam applies Zero tolerance towards plagiarism and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in the journal.

Definition: Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Policy: Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

All submitted papers will be checked of their similarity by Turnitin or Ithenticate.

When plagiarism is identified, the Principal Editor responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

Similarity Level
Manthiq : Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam practices Zero tolerance towards plagiarism. We use Turnitin or Ithenticate to evaluate the similarity index and then the editor decides the case of possible plagiarism (Similarity report will be provided to the author). Editorial board has passed the following actions:

  1. Similarity Index above 40%: Article Rejected (due to poor citation and/or poor paraphrasing, article outright rejected, NO RESUBMISSION accepted).
  2. Similarity Index (15-40%): Send to the author for improvement (provide correct citations to all places of similarity and do good paraphrasing even if the citation is provided).
  3. Similarity index Less than 10%: Accepted or citation improvement may be required (proper citations must be provided to all outsourced texts).
  4. In cases 2 and 3: The authors should revise the article carefully, add required citations, and do good paraphrasing to outsourced text. And resubmit the article with a new Turnitin report showing NO PLAGIARISM and similarity less than 15%.

 

Peer Reviewer Procces

Description
Submissions should be prepared in accordance with the Author Guidelines. The manuscript may be returned to authors without a scientific assessment if they do not meet all submission requirements, if they are not in the correct format, or cannot be downloaded reliably.
Submissions must represent the original and independent work of the authors. Each new submission is assessed by Principal Editor to determine whether it falls within the general remit of the Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam. We will reject a manuscript without review if it contains insufficient content; it exceeds our word limit or is incorrectly formatted; it is poorly presented and unclear. Manuscripts that pass the initial assessment will be handled by Principal Editor or Associate Editor to oversee the review process for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation.
Once a manuscript passes the initial checks, it will be assigned to at least TWO independent experts for peer-review. A DOUBLE-BLIND review is applied, where authors' identities are not known to reviewers, and vice versa. Peer review comments are confidential and will only be disclosed with the express agreement of the reviewer. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and authors can expect a decision, or an explanation for the delay, within 2-4 months of receipt. If a revision is invited, the corresponding author should submit the revised manuscript within 2-4 weeks. The final decision is taken by Principal Editors and/or by the Section Editor based on the information gained through the peer-review process.


We ensure that the reviewed manuscript is treated confidentially prior to being published, as explained in publication ethics.
Types of Decision
There are four types of editorial decisions during the peer review process, which are:
 
Decline submission
Following peer review, the paper is judged not to be acceptable for publication in  of Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam.


Resubmit for Review
The submitted version of the paper is not acceptable and requires major revision, but there is clear potential in the work, and of  Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam is prepared to consider a new version. Authors are offered the opportunity to resubmit their paper as a new submission. Concerns will remain regarding the suitability of the paper for publication until the editors are convinced by the authors that their paper fits the scope and standards of Journal of  Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam The resubmitted manuscript will be returned to the original associate editor if at all possible.

Revision
The paper requires changes before a final decision can be made. Authors are asked to modify their manuscript in light of comments received from referees and editors and to submit a new version for consideration within 2 weeks of receiving the decision letter. A point-by-point explanation of how comments have been addressed must be supplied with the revised version of the paper. Revisions may undergo further peer review and papers may undergo more than one round of revision. If the authors do not revise their papers to the satisfaction of the editors, the paper can still be declined from publication in Journal of  Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam.

Accept submission
The paper is accepted for publication, subject to conditions that need to be addressed in producing a final version of the manuscript. These may include sub-editing changes and the minor amendment to ensure the paper fully matches our criteria. After final checking in the editorial office, acceptance is confirmed and the paper is forwarded to the publishers for publication.
 
Galley Proof
Page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for final checking. Corrections to the proofs must be restricted to printer’s errors: any other changes to the text, in equations or grammar, may be charged to the author. Proofs should be returned to the editors within three days of receipt to minimize the risk of the author’s contribution having to be held over to a later issue. The editors do not accept responsibility for the correctness of published content. It is the author’s responsibility to check the content at the proof stage.
 
Editorial and Publishing Process
Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam follows the editorial and publishing process set by PKP, as presented in the following figure.

 

Reviewer Guidelines

Description
Submissions should be prepared in accordance with the Author Guidelines. The manuscript may be returned to authors without a scientific assessment if they do not meet all submission requirements, if they are not in the correct format, or cannot be downloaded reliably.
Submissions must represent the original and independent work of the authors. Each new submission is assessed by Principal Editor to determine whether it falls within the general remit of the Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam. We will reject a manuscript without review if it contains insufficient content; it exceeds our word limit or is incorrectly formatted; it is poorly presented and unclear. Manuscripts that pass the initial assessment will be handled by Principal Editor or Associate Editor to oversee the review process for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation.
Once a manuscript passes the initial checks, it will be assigned to at least TWO independent experts for peer-review. A DOUBLE-BLIND review is applied, where authors' identities are not known to reviewers, and vice versa. Peer review comments are confidential and will only be disclosed with the express agreement of the reviewer. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and authors can expect a decision, or an explanation for the delay, within 2-4 months of receipt. If a revision is invited, the corresponding author should submit the revised manuscript within 2-4 weeks. The final decision is taken by Principal Editors and/or by the Section Editor based on the information gained through the peer-review process.

We ensure that the reviewed manuscript is treated confidentially prior to being published, as explained in publication ethics.
Types of Decision
There are four types of editorial decisions during the peer review process, which are:
 
Decline submission
Following peer review, the paper is judged not to be acceptable for publication in  of  Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam.
 
Resubmit for Review
The submitted version of the paper is not acceptable and requires major revision, but there is clear potential in the work, and of  Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam is prepared to consider a new version. Authors are offered the opportunity to resubmit their paper as a new submission. Concerns will remain regarding the suitability of the paper for publication until the editors are convinced by the authors that their paper fits the scope and standards of Journal of  Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam. The resubmitted manuscript will be returned to the original associate editor if at all possible.

Revision
The paper requires changes before a final decision can be made. Authors are asked to modify their manuscript in light of comments received from referees and editors and to submit a new version for consideration within 2 weeks of receiving the decision letter. A point-by-point explanation of how comments have been addressed must be supplied with the revised version of the paper. Revisions may undergo further peer review and papers may undergo more than one round of revision. If the authors do not revise their papers to the satisfaction of the editors, the paper can still be declined from publication in Journal of Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam.

Accept submission
The paper is accepted for publication, subject to conditions that need to be addressed in producing a final version of the manuscript. These may include sub-editing changes and the minor amendment to ensure the paper fully matches our criteria. After final checking in the editorial office, acceptance is confirmed and the paper is forwarded to the publishers for publication.
 
Galley Proof
Page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for final checking. Corrections to the proofs must be restricted to printer’s errors: any other changes to the text, in equations or grammar, may be charged to the author. Proofs should be returned to the editors within three days of receipt to minimize the risk of the author’s contribution having to be held over to a later issue. The editors do not accept responsibility for the correctness of published content. It is the author’s responsibility to check the content at the proof stage.
 
Editorial and Publishing Process
Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam follows the editorial and publishing process set by PKP, as presented in the following figure.

 

 

Author Guidelines

General Requirements:

  1. Manuscripts submitted to Journal of Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam should be research-based papers or article reviews that have not been published or are under consideration elsewhere.
  2. Manuscripts must be in English. It should be typed in MS Word doc. format; using 11-pt Cambria; left, right, top, and bottom margins are 2 cm; 1-spaced on A4-sized paper; 3000-7000 words.
  3. The manuscript will be reviewed by subject reviewers, while the editors reserve the right to edit the manuscript for format consistency without altering the substance.
  4. Make sure that the manuscript is prepared using the Article Template.
  5. The citations and references should follow the style of the American Psychological Association (APA) 6th Edition and use Reference Management Software.
  6. The manuscript must be checked in terms of grammar, structure, spelling, etc. It is suggested to use Grammar Checker Software Grammarly (http://app.grammarly.com).

Types of Paper
Journal of Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam receives manuscripts in an original research paper and review paper.

  1. Original research paper, which is an article that reports detailed research and classified as primary literature. Its format includes an introduction and background problems, review of literature and hypotheses development, research method, results, interpretations of findings, discussion, and conclusion. The length of the paper is generally between 4000-7000 words.
  2. A review paper, which is an article that provides up-to-date reports and discussions on the current issues of education management and instruction. It discusses previous development from the topic and gives an overview of the future. Its format includes an introduction and followed by necessary subsections. In general, a review paper usually consists of 3000-6000 words, depending on the case being reviewed. 

General Structure of Original Research

Paper Identity
The paper title must be concise and informative. It should be pinpoint with the issue discussed and should not exceed 20 words. The title should represent the primary problem and/or main variables of the paper. The title is followed by the authors' names, affiliation, and email. The names of authors should be written without any academic title. An ORCID ID must be added for each author. 

Abstract
The abstract should be clear and informative, and is created in a single paragraph, consisting 150-300 words. The abstract should succinctly describe your entire paper. It begins with the research gap, and followed by the purpose of the research, methodology, main results, and contribution of the findings. The abstract should stand alone, which means that no citation or no references in the abstract. The abstract should tell the prospective reader what the author did and highlight the key findings. Avoid using technical jargon and uncommon abbreviations. Following the abstract, 3-5 keywords that are well selected and closely related to the research topic must be provided. 

Introduction
The introduction of research paper should clearly state the purpose of the paper. It includes key references to appropriate work. It states the significant contribution of the research. The introduction should consist of the background of the study, research contexts, review of previous research, research gaps, and research objectives (at the end of the introduction). The introduction should show the scientific merit or novelty of the paper. All introductions should be presented in the forms of paragraphs, not pointers, and with a proportion of 15-20% of the whole article length.
The introduction should comprise literature review that includes a review of related literature in essay style. The purpose of a literature review is to “look again” (re+view) at what previous researchers have done regarding to the topics of the article. Thus, in the literature review, the researchers should critically evaluates, re-organizes and synthesizes the work of previous researchers, then followed by the formulation of hypotheses (if any).

Research Method
The method section consists of a description concerning the research design, sample selection and data sources, research instruments, data collection, and data analysis (variable measurement) with the proportion of 10-15% of the total article length, all presented in the form of paragraphs.

Results
The results obtained from the research have to be supported by sufficient data. The research results and the discovery must be the answers of the research questions and/or hypotheses stated previously in the review of literature part. The results section consists of a description of the results of the data analysis to answer the research question(s). The results should summarize (scientific) findings. It usually contains data presented in the form of tables, interview responses, and figures (see the Article Template for detail description of how to present tables, interview responses, figures, and graphs)

Discussion
Every author has different style in writing discussion section. In general, the discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. In the discussion, it is the most important section of your article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main scientific findings. The meanings of the findings should be shown from current theories and references of the area addressed. The following components should be covered in discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or hypothesis outlined in the Introduction/review of literature section (what)? Do you provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences? In qualitative research, DISCUSSION can be presented along with the RESULT section to depict an in-depth explanation about the issue being discussed. 

Conclusion
The conclusion section consists of the summary, restatement of the main findings. It should state concisely the most important propositions of the paper as well as the author’s views of the practical implications of the result. Tell how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without a clear conclusion, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the Abstract, or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You can also suggest future research and point out those that are underway. Write only one or two paragraphs for the Conclusion.

References
This section lists all the references cited in the text. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction uses APA style. The references should be more up-to-date (published in the last 5-10 years). The primary sources cited in your paper are in the forms of journal articles, proceedings, research reports including theses and dissertations that can be accessed online (show the DOI address/URL). Citations from online journal articles should be at least 80% of the total references cited. Citation and reference systems must use the Reference Management System such as Mendeley, EndNote, Zotero.

Appendix (if any)

General Structure of Review Paper

Paper Identity
The paper title must be concise and informative. It should be pinpoint with the issue discussed and should not exceed 20 words. The title should represent the primary problem and/or main variables of the paper. The title is followed by the authors' names, affiliation, and email. The names of authors should be written without any academic title. An ORCID ID must be added for each author. 

Abstract
The abstract should be clear and informative, and is created in a single paragraph, consisting of 150-300 words. The abstract should succinctly describe your entire paper. It explains the background of the issue, the purpose of the paper, and the key points of issue discussion. Following the abstract, 3-5 keywords that are well selected and closely related to the research topic must be provided. 

Introduction
The introduction of research paper should clearly state the purpose of the paper. It includes key references to appropriate work. It states the significant contribution of the research. The introduction of a review paper generally contains background and context of the issue being discussed, current trends of the problem studied, and justification of the authors' reasons for reviewing the literature.

Necessary Subthemes/subsections
Following introduction, necessary sub-themes or sections can be added, depending on the topic of the paper being discussed.

Conclusion
The conclusions in the review article differ slightly from the conclusions of the original research paper. The conclusions generally contain the implications of the findings, the interpretation by the authors, and the identification of unresolved recital questions.

References
This section lists all the references cited in the text. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction uses APA style. The references should be more up-to-date (published in the last 5-10 years). The primary sources cited in your paper are in the forms of journal articles, proceedings, research reports including theses and dissertations that can be accessed online (show the DOI address/URL). Citations from online journal articles should be at least 80% of the total references cited. Citation and reference systems must use the Reference Management System such as Mendeley, EndNote, Zotero.

Language (Usage & Editing Services)
Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these). Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing to eliminate possible grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific English may wish to use the English Language Editing service.

Table & Figure

  1. Please submit tables as editable text and not as images.
  2. Tables or figures can be placed either before or after the relevant text in the article.
  3. Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body.
  4. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article.
  5. Please avoid using vertical rules and shading in table cells. 
  6. Tables should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order. 
  7. Examples of using tables and figures, available in full in manuscript/paper template.

References
Journal of Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam uses APA style. Citation and reference systems must use the Reference Management System such as Mendeley, EndNote, Zotero. Starting from Volume 2, Number 2 (2022), paper published in JEMIn should use hyperlink to ensure the efficacy and accuracy of citation and references.

 

Deposit Policy

Berikut ini adalah Kebijakan Deposit Manthiq: Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam artikel baik saat sedang dikirimkan, sudah diterima, ataupun telah diterbitkan yang meliputi :

  1. Situs web pribadi
  2. Repositori institusi.
  3. Jejaring kolaborasi sosial/Social Collaboration Networks (SCNs) yang telah menandatangani Prinsip Berbagi Sukarela.
  4. Individu yang meminta penggunaan pribadi untuk pengajaran dan pelatihan dalam institusi Penulis, dan sebagai bagian dari aplikasi hibah Penulis selama digunakan untuk tujuan pendidikan dan sosial.