Application Impact of Imam al-Shȃfi’i’s Qiyas on the Development of Islamic Legal Thought

Muhammad Roy Purwanto, Hamidullah Marazi, Ahmad Arun Nafid

Abstract


In the realm of methodology of Islamic jurisprudence (ushul al-fiqh), qiyas, a method of deriving Islamic law, holds a prominent position. It entails analogizing a legal ruling from a situation devoid of explicit textual guidance (nash) to a situation with established textual guidance, based on the shared underlying cause (illat). This is a descriptive research with a philosophical approach. The type of research used is library research with primary data referring to the original source, namely the book of logic by Aristotle. While secondary data is taken from works containing Aristotelian logic. This study found that Imam al-Shâfi’i stands as the pioneer in formulating qiyas as a method of ijtihad (legal reasoning). His rigorous formulation of qiyas drew theoretical underpinnings from Aristotelian logic. The incorporation of Aristotelian logic into qiyas imbued the method with a strict and contrapositive nature, adhering to the principles of syllogistic logic. In syllogistic reasoning, the conclusion invariably follows from the major premise, which in qiyas is derived from the sacred text (the Quran). To overcome this intellectual stagnation, a burhani methodology, as championed by Ibn Rushd, Ibn Khaldun, Ibn Hazm, and al-Shâtibi, emerged. This methodology successfully established a liberal rational epistemology grounded in the spirit of burhani logic and contextualized Quranic interpretation.

 

Dalam ranah metodologi yurisprudensi Islam (ushul fiqh), qiyas, sebuah metode untuk memperoleh hukum Islam, memegang posisi yang menonjol. Metode ini melibatkan analogisasi putusan hukum dari situasi yang tidak memiliki petunjuk tekstual yang jelas (nash) ke situasi dengan petunjuk tekstual yang mapan, berdasarkan penyebab dasar yang sama (illat). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan filosofis. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan dengan data primer mengacu pada sumber asli yaitu kitab logika karya Aristoteles. Sedangkan data sekunder diambil dari karya-karya yang mengandung logika Aristotelian. Studi ini menemukan bahwa Imam al-Shâfi'i berdiri sebagai pelopor dalam merumuskan qiyas sebagai metode ijtihad (penalaran hukum). Perumusannya yang ketat tentang qiyas mengambil dasar-dasar teoritis dari logika Aristoteles. Penggabungan logika Aristoteles ke dalam qiyas mengilhami metode tersebut dengan sifat yang ketat dan kontrapositif, yang mematuhi prinsip-prinsip logika silogistik. Dalam penalaran silogistik, kesimpulan selalu mengikuti premis utama, yang dalam qiyas berasal dari teks suci (Alquran). Untuk mengatasi stagnasi intelektual ini, muncullah sebuah metodologi burhani, sebagaimana yang dipelopori oleh Ibnu Rushd, Ibnu Khaldun, Ibnu Hazm, dan al-Shatibi. Metodologi ini berhasil membangun epistemologi rasional liberal yang berlandaskan pada semangat logika burhani dan penafsiran Alquran yang kontekstual.


Keywords


qiyas; legal derivation; ijtihad; syllogism; logic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Sulaiman, Konsep Al-Qiyas Imam Al-Syâfi’iy Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Islam,” in Islamic Studies Dissertation, Jakarta: IAIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 1993.

Ahwâni, Fu’âd Al-, Al-Falsafah Al-Islâmiyyah. Kairo: al-Maktabah al-Tsaqâfah, n.d.

Alwani, Tâhâ Jâbir Al-, Source Methodology in Islamic Jurisprudence. Herdon, Virginia: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 1994.

Ali, Muhammad Daud, Hukum Islam: Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Islam Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.

Amîn, Ahmad, Fajr Al-Islâm, Kairo: Maktabah al-Nahdlah al-Islâmiyyah, n.d.

Anas, Mâlik bin. Al-Muwaththa’ Juz, 2, Kairo: Dâr Ihyâ’ al-Kutub al-‘Arrabiyyah, 1937.

Aristoteles, “Prior and Posterior,” in Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, Ed. Ross, W.D. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1949.

Badrân, Badrân Abû al-‘Aynayn, Ushûl Al-Fiqh Al-Islâmi, Alexandria: Mu’asasah Shabâb al-Jâmi’ah, 1982.

Bagus, Lorens, Kamus Filsafat, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2000.

Beth, Evert W, Formal Methods: An Introduction to Symbolic Logic and to The Study of Effective Operations in Arithmetic and Logic, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1962.

Bik, Hafni, (Et.Al), Kitâb Qawâ’id Al-Lughah Al-‘Arrabiyyah Li Talâmidz Al-Madâris Al-Tsânawiyyah, Surabaya: Maktabah al-Hidâyah, n.d.

Bik, Muhammad Khudhâri, Târîkh Al-Tasyrî’ Al-Islâmi, Mesir: Maktabah al-Tijâriyah, 1960.

Burton, John, The Sources of Islamic Law: Islamic Theories of Abrogation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990.

Cooley, John C, A Primer of Formal Logic, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1949.

Copi, Irving M, Introduction to Logic, London: The Macmillan Company, 1969.

Creighton, James Edwin, An Introductory Logic, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1926.

Dadri, Anwar A, Islamic Jurisprudence in The Modern World, Lahore: Muhammad Ashraf, 1973.

Donald, Daniel Mc, Controversy Logic in Writing and Reading, Scranton: Chandler Publishing Company, n.d.

Fakhry, Majid. Sejarah Filsafat Islam, Terj. Mulyadhi Kartanegara, Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya, 1986.

Fatah, Adib Bisri & Munawwir A, Kamus Al-Bisyri: Indonesia-Arab Dan Arab-Indonesia, Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif, 1999.

Fazlur Rahman, pent. Ahsin Mohammad, Islam, Bandung: Pustaka Hidaya, 2000.

Frederick Copleston, S.J. A History of Philosophy, London and New Jersey: Search Press and Paulist Press, 1946.

Ghazâli, Abû Hâmid Al-, Al-Mustashfâ, Jilid. 2. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risâlah, 1978.

Hallaq, Wael B, Sejarah Teori Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2000.

Hanîfah, Nu’mân bin Tsâbit Abî, Musnad Imâm Abî Hanîfah, Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr al-Arabi, n.d.

Hasan, Ahmad, The Early Development of Islamic Jurisprudence. New Delhi: Adam Publisher &Distributor, 1994.

———, The Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence: The Command of The Syari’ah and Juridical Norm, New Delhi: Adam Publisher &Distributor, 1994.

———, Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of The Juridical Principle of Qiyas, Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, 1986.

Jâbiri, Muhammad Âbid Al-, Bunyat Al-‘Aql Al-‘Arraby: Dirâsah Tahlîliyyah Naqdiyah Li Al-Nudzûm Al-Ma’Rifah Fî Al-Tsaqâfah Al-‘Arrabiyyah, Beirut: Markaz Dirâsat al-Wahdah al-‘Arabiyyah, 1990.

———, Post Tradisionalisme Islam, Pent. Ahmad Baso, Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2000.

———, Takwîn Al-‘Aql Al-‘Arabi, Beirut: Markaz Dirâsah al-Wahdah al-‘Arabiyyah, 1989.

Jawziyyah, Ibn Qayyim Al-, “ I’lâm Al-Muwâqi’în.” 23. Juz. 1., n.d.

———, I’lâm Al-Muwâqi’în, Jilid. 1, Beirut: Muassasah al-Risâlah, 1978.

———, I’lâm Al-Muwâqi’în ‘an Rabb Al-‘Alamîn, New Delhi: Asyraf al-Mathâbi’, 1313.

———, Miftâh Dâr Al-Sa’âdah Juz 2, Kairo: al-Khaniji, n.d.

Jurjâni, Abû Bakr ‘Abd al-Qâhir Ibn ‘Abd al-Rahmân Al-, Asrâr Al-Balâghah Fi ‘Ilm Al-Bayân, Ed. Muhammad Rasyîd Ridhâ, Kairo: Mathba’ah al-Tarâqi, 1320.

Kamali, Muhammad Hasyim, Principle of Islamic Jurisprudence: The Islamic Texts Society, Cambridge: 5 Green Street, 1991.

Kaufmann, Walter, “Posterior Analytics,” in Philosophic Classics: Thales to ST. Thomas,. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, N.J, n.d.

Lejewski, Creslaw, “History of Logic,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed. Paul Edwards Vol. 3. New York and London: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. & The Free Press, n.d.

Mu’thi, Fârûq ‘Abd Al-, Al-Imâm Al-Syâfi’i: Muhammad Bin Idrîs Bin Al-‘Abbâs Al-Quraysyi Al-Muthallibi Al-Syâfi’i Al-Makki, Edited by Dâr al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1992.

Madzkûr, Muhammad Salâm, Al-Madkhal Li Al-Fiqh Al-Islâmi, Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, n.d.

———, Mabâhis Al-Hukm ‘ind Al-Ushûliyyîn, Mesir: âr al-Nahdlah al-Arabiyyah, 1972.

Magill, Frank N, No Title, New York: Harper Collins Publisher, 1990.

Makdisi, George, “The Juridical Theology of Sufi: Origins and Significance of Ushul Al-Fiqh,” Studia Islamica, vol. 59, 1984.

Minhaji, Akh, Reorientasi Kajian Usul Fiqh, AL-Jâmi’âh 63, 1999.

Mudhofir, Ali, Kamus Filsuf Barat, Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2002.

Mudzhar, Muhammad Atho, Membaca Gelombang Ijtihad: Antara Tradisi Dan Liberasi, Yogyakarta: Titihan Ilahi Press, 1998.

Muqaffâ, Read Ibn, Risâlah Fi Al-Shahâbah, in Rasâ’il Al-Bulaqhâ’, Kairo: Mathba’ah al-Ma’ârif, 1954.

Mûsâ, Yûsuf, Al-Madkhal Li Dirâsah Al-Fiqh Al-Islâmi, Kairo: Maktabah al-Nahdlah, 1954.

Nashr Hâmid Abû Zayd, “Al-Imâm Al-Syâfi’i.” 94, n.d.

Nyazee, Imran Ahsan Khan, Theories of Islamic Law, Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute and International Institute of Islamic Thought, 1945.

Pojman, Louis P, Philosophy: The Quest for Truth, New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999.

Qudâmah, Ibn, Rawdhat Al-Nadzîr Wa Junnah Al-Munâdzir, Jilid. 2, Beirut: Muassasah al-Risâlah, 1978.

Rahim, Abdur, The Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence: According to The Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hambali Schools, New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan, 1994.

Rayyân, Muhammad ‘Ali Abû, Qirâ’ât Fi Al-Falsafah. Iskandariyah: Multazam al-Thab’ wa al-Nasyr, n.d.

Râziq, Mushthafâ Bâsyâ ‘Abd Al-, Tamhîd Li Târîkh Al-Falsafah Al-Islâmiyyah, Kairo: Maktabah Lajnah al-Ta’lîf wa al-Tarjamah wa al-Nasyr, 245AD.

Sarakhsi Al-, Ushûl Al-Sarakhsi, Juz. 2, Kairo: Mathba’ah al-Sa’âdah, 1953.

Shadr Al-, Muhammad Baqir. Falsafatuna: Pandangan Muhammad Baqir Al-Shadr Terhadap Pelbagai Aliran Filsafat Dunia, Transl. M. Nur Mufid, Bandung: Mizan, 1992.

Subki, Tâj al-Dîn ‘Abd al-Wahhâb Al-, Jam’ Al-Jawâmi’, Jilid. 3. Beirut: Dâr al-Fik, 1974.

Suyûthi, Jalâl al-Dîn Al-, Shawn Al-Manthiq Wa Al-Kalâm ‘an Fann Al-Manthiq Wa Al-Kalâm, Kairo: Dâr al-Kutub, 1948.

Syâfi’i, Muhammad bin Idrîs Al-, Al-Risâlah Li Al-Imâm Al-Muthallibi Muhammad Bin Idrîs Al-Syâfi’i, Tahqîq Ahmad Muhammad Syâkir, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, nd, n.d.

———, Kitâb Al-Umm, Kairo: : Bulaq, n.d.

Syawkâni, Muhammad bin Ali Al-, Irsyâd Al-Fuhûl,. Beirut: Dâr Ibn Hazm, n.d.

———, Nayl Al-Authâr, Jilid. 7. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1978.

Schacht, Joseph, Foreign Elements in Ancient Islamic Law,’ in Islamic Law and Legal Theory,Ed. Ian Edge, New York: New York University Press, 1996.

Sjadzali, Munawir, Ijtihad Kemanusiaan, Jakarta: Paramadina, 1997.

Sober, Elliott, Core Questions in Philosophy, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995.

Suriasumantri, Jujun S, Ilmu Dalam Perspektif: Sebuah Kumpulan Karangan Tentang Hakekat Ilmu, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2001.

Thâlib, Shûfî Hasan Abû, Bayn Al-Syarî’ah Al-Islâmiyyah Wa Al-Qânûn Al-Rûmân, 1st ed. Kairo: Maktabah al-Nahdlah, n.d.

Triyanta, Agus, “Syllogisma, Kalva-Khomer, Dan Qiyas Adakah Dari Satu Akar: Pelacakan Terhadap Pengaruh Logika Aristoteles in Qiyas Imam Al-Syâfi’i,” PSH Fakultas Hukum UII. Yogyakarta, 2002.

Verhaak, C. and Haryono Imam. , Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jakarta: Gramedia, 1989.

Wehr, Hans. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, London and Beirut: Macdonald & Evans LTD and Brairie Du Liban, n.d.

Wijaya, Ahsin, “Membaca Nalar Ushul Fiqh Al-Syâfi’i”, in Makalah Deciphering Al-Shâfi’î’s Rationality in Usul Al-Fiqh: A Critical Discourse), Paper Presented at the Book Review Seminar at the Center for Islamic Studies [PSI] Universitas Islam Indonesia,” 2004.

Zalami, Mushthafâ Ibrâhîm Al-, Dalâlat Al-Nushûsh Wa Thuruq Istinbât Al-Ahkâm Fî Daw’ Ushûl Al-Fiqh Al-Islâmi, Baghdad: Mathba’ah Asad, 1973.

Zamakhsyari Al-, Asas Al-Balâghah, Kairo: Dâr al-Kutub al-Mishriyyah, 1923.

Zhâhiri, Ali bin Ahmad al-Qurthubi Al-, Al-Nubadz Fi Ushûl Al-Fiqh Al-Zhâhiri, Beirut: Dâr Ibn Hazm, 1993.

Zuhayli, Wahbah Al-, Ushûl Fiqh, Juz1 ed., n.d.

———, Ushûl Fiqh, Juz. 1, 610; Nasrun Haroen, Ushul Fiqh, n.d.

Zahrah, Muhammad Abu. Ushûl Al-Fiqh Al-Ja’fari. Mesir: Dâr al-Fikr al-‘Arabi, n.d.

———. Ushul Fiqih. Cet. XI. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2018.

Zahrah, Muhammad Abû. Târîkh Al-Madzâhib Al-Islâmiyyah. Mesir: Dâr al-Fikr al-Arâbi, n.d.

———. Ushûl Al-Fiqh. Kairo: Dâr al-Fikr al-‘Arabi, 1987.

Zamzam A, Abdillah. “Pro-Kontra Pengaruh Filsafat Terhadap Nahwu.” Adabiyyat 1, no. 2, 2003.

Zayd, Nashr Hâmid Abû. , Al-Imâm Al-Syâfi’i Wa Ta’sîs Al-Idiyulujiyyah Al-Wasathiyyah. Kairo. Sina Li al-nasyr, 1992.

Ziadeh, Farhat J. Ushul Al-Fiqh” in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, Ed. John L. Esposito. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

“Even during Al-Shāfi‘ī’s Lifetime, There Were Hadith Scholars Such as Al-Zuhri (d. 124 H), Shu’bah (d. 160 H), Sufyān Al-Thauri (d. 161 H), Sufyān Ibn ‘Uyaynah (d. 198 H), and Waqī’ Ibn Al-Jarrah (d. 197 H). However, They Made No Attempt to Eradicate or O,” n.d.

“In His Various Writings, Al-Shāfi‘ī Frequently Employs the Terms Ahl Al-Ḥadīth, Ahl Al-Qiyās, and Ahl Al-Kalām. According to Him, Ahl Al-Ḥadīth Are Scholars Who Rely Heavily on Al-Ḥadīth in Their Legal Rulings, Disregarding Ra’y (Personal Opinion). Ahl Al,” n.d.

“This Method of Arguing Is Also Taught by Aristotle’s Logic, Read Aristoteles, Topik (Organon Teil V) (Leipzig: Verlag Von Felix Meina, 1948)” (n.d.).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/madania.v28i1.4219

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexing by :

_______________________________________________


Creative Commons License
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman is published UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu and distributed with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License..

__________________________________________________

Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl. Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu 38211
Bengkulu, Sumatra Indonesia