THE IMPACTS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS OF ENGLISH CONNECTORS ON EFL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION
Abstract
There have been many studies on English grammar, but a dearth of studies has been conducted in the cross-sectional fields such as seeking how the field of grammar makes contributions to reading comprehension. Accordingly, the current study sought to find out the impacts of explicit and implicit instructions of English connectors on EFL students’ reading comprehension. 50 third semester students from an English department at a university in Bengkulu were incorporated as the samples. Adopting a quasi-experimental method, those 50 students were split into two classes, the so-called experimental and control classes. Students in the experimental class were taught English connectors explicitly, and those of the control class were taught English connectors implicitly. Before eight times of treatments in the form of the two ways of instructions, students of the two group were given a valid and reliable reading comprehension pre-test, and a similar construct of post-test was given after the eighth treatments ended. The data of the current study were analyzed by deploying paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test. The present study revealed that explicit and implicit instructions of English connectors had positive impacts on EFL students’ reading comprehension. However, the explicit instruction of English connectors enhanced EFL students’ reading comprehension more significantly and more effectively. The foregoing was demonstrated by the explicit instruction’s post-test score of 78.5 with SD of 19.787 which was higher than the implicit instruction’s post-test score of 66.75 with SD of 25.05. It is recommended that further studies be conducted to replicate the present study in different contexts for the sake of providing rich data to confirm the current study’s results.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anggraini, D., Hidayah, J., Edy, S., & Ariani, D. (2021). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Interculturality in English Learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(2), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2398
Anggraini, M., Afriani, Z.L., & Riswanto. (2020). The effect of Question Answer Relationship (QAR) Strategy in enhancing students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(4), 548-558.
Apriani, E., & Hidayah, J. (2019). The ICT Used by the English Lecturers for Non English Study Program Students at STAIN Curup. Vision: Journal For Language And Foreign Language Learning. http://repository.iaincurup.ac.id/id/eprint/121
Apriani, E., Supardan, D., & Sartika, E. (2019). Utilizing ICT to develop student’s language ethic at Islamic university. POTENSIA. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/potensia/article/view/6279
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., Walker, D. A., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. In Measurement (8th ed., Vol. 4, Issue 43). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Aryadi, R., Hidayah, J., & Edy, S. (2020). The portrait of English teaching grounded in interculturality. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(3), 323–347.
Aryadoust, V., & Baghaei, P. (2016). Does EFL Readers’ Lexical and Grammatical Knowledge Predict Their Reading Ability? Insights From a Perceptron Artificial Neural Network Study. Educational Assessment, 21(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1166343
Asiyaban, A. R., Yamini, M., Bagheri, M. S., & Yarmohammadi, L. (2020). Implicit/explicit knowledge and its contribution towards tense consistency employment across EFL learners’ proficiency levels. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1727129
Basturkmen, H. (2018). Explicit Versus Implicit Grammar Knowledge. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0060
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman. http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=EE1EABA9220799F9939B16E0D751FFD6
Bolton, K., Nelson, G., & Hung, J. (2002). A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol
Bourdieu, P., Costa, C., & Murphy, M. (2016). Theory as method in research: on Bourdieu, social theory and education. Taylor & Francis (CAM); Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Second Edi). Longman.
Cano, F., García, Á., Berbén, A. B. G., & Justicia, F. (2014). Science Learning: A path analysis of its links with reading comprehension, question-asking in class and science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1710–1732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.876678
Carella, B. (2011). Argument and Rhetoric. Adverbial Connectors in the History of English (Topics in Linguistics 64). English Studies, 92(5), 584–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838x.2011.574398
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2013). A contrastive study of the variation of sentence connectors in academic English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.04.002
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press. http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=4489813B13ACC0505DA066C9497DD79C
Chung, J. S. L. (2000). Signals and reading comprehension - Theory and practice. System, 28(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00010-5
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE publications, Inc.
Criado, R. (2016). Insights from Skill Acquisition Theory for grammar activity sequencing and design in Foreign Language Teaching. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090996
Cushing, I. (2020). A textured and sensory grammar for the experience of reading. English in Education, 54(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1626196
Das, D., & Taboada, M. (2018). Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers. Discourse Processes, 55(8), 743–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1379327
Davatgari Asl, H., & Moradinejad, A. (2016). The effect of explicit instruction of discourse markers on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking ability. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1777806
Deng, W. Q., Asma, S., & Paré, G. (2014). Meta-analysis of SNPs involved in variance heterogeneity using Levene’s test for equal variances. European Journal of Human Genetics, 22(3), 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.166
Dupont, M. (2015). Word order in English and French. English Text Construction, 8(1), 88–124. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.8.1.04dup
Farzam, M. (2018). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategy training on intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. DhamothaInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(1), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.193
Fauziati, E. (2014). Methods of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Era PustakaUtama.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
García-Fuentes, C., & McDonough, K. (2018). The effect of explicit instruction and task repetition on Colombian EFL students’ use of politeness strategies during disagreements. Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1167232
Glaser, R. E. (2014). Levene’s Robust Test of Homogeneity of Variances. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat01642
Habók, A., Magyar, A., & Hui, S. K. F. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. English Language Series. Longman. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2122385
Hamied, F. A. (2012). English in Multicultural and Multilingual Indonesian Education. Multilingual Education, 1(English as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4578-0_5
Harputlu, L., & Ceylan, E. (2014). The Effects of Motivation and Metacognitive Strategy Use on EFL Listening Proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.056
Hellerstein-Yehezkel, D. (2017). The path to reading comprehension through intercultural competence in the multicultural EFL classroom*. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1261875
Hidayah, J. (2017). Speaking and Writing Assessment Applied by English Lecturers of State College for Islamic Studies (STAIN) at Curup-Bengkulu. Academic Journal of English Language. http://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/english/article/view/150
Hyland, K. (2005). Representing readers in writing: student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150304.21
Islam, E. A.-. (2016). A New Literacy: The role of technology to develop student’s character. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/tadib/article/view/742
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279
Kirkpatrick, A., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2017). Language education policy and practice in East and Southeast Asia. Languange Teaching, 50(2), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000027
Kleijn, S. (2018). Clozing in on readability : How linguistic features affect and predict text comprehension and on-line processing [Utrecht University]. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/363346
Kleijn, Suzanne, Pander Maat, H. L. W., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2019). Comprehension Effects of Connectives Across Texts, Readers, and Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 56(5–6), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1605257
Kusumaningputri, R., & Widodo, H. P. (2018). Promoting Indonesian university students’ critical intercultural awareness in tertiary EAL classrooms: The use of digital photograph-mediated intercultural tasks. System, 72, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.003
Landi, N., & Ryherd, K. (2017). Understanding specific reading comprehension deficit: A review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12234
Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara, Social Humaniora, 12(1), 9–20.
Law, Y. K. (2009). The role of attribution beliefs, motivation and strategy use in Chinese fifth-graders’ reading comprehension. Educational Research, 51(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802704764
Lotfipour, S. K. (2006). Towards the textuality of a text: On a grammar for communication. In Journal of Language Teaching and Research (Issue 2). Forouzesh Publications. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.2.387-395
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum. http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=C3F4A1B0461408A10A6A1A5A61802282
Martina, F., Syafryadin, S., Rakhmanina, L., & Juwita, S. (2020). The Effect of Time Constraint on Student Reading Comprehension Test Performance in Narrative Text. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(3), 323-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i3.2625
Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: A textlinguistic study. Peter Lang.
Mohammadi, R. R., Saeidi, M., & Ahangari, S. (2020). Self-regulated learning instruction and the relationships among self-regulation, reading comprehension and reading problem solving: PLS-SEM approach. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1746105
Mojarrabi Tabrizi, H., Behnam, B., Saeidi, M., & Lu, X. (2019). The effect of soft vs. hard scaffolding on reading comprehension skill of EFL learners in different experimental conditions. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1631562
Molencki, R. (2011). Ursula Lenker, Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Anglia, 129(1–2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2011.012
Namaziandost, E., Esfahani, F. R., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). Varying levels of difficulty in L2 reading materials in the efl classroom: Impact on comprehension and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1615740
Parra-Frutos, I. (2009). The behaviour of the modified Levene’s test when data are not normally distributed. Computational Statistics, 24(4), 671–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-009-0154-z
Potgieter, A. P., & Conradie, S. (2013). Explicit grammar teaching in EAL classrooms: Suggestions from isiXhosa speakers’ L2 data. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 31(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2013.793956
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman. http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=AD561F78FA16E76FD510AEBA50E0936A
Sanjaya, H., Apriani, E., & And, S. E. (2020). Using web blogs in teaching writing for EFL students. Journal of English Education. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eka_Apriani/publication/347298346_Using_Web_Blog_for_EFL_Students_in_Writing_Class/links/5fd9a2e245851553a0bd724e/Using-Web-Blog-for-EFL-Students-in-Writing-Class.pdf
Sanz, C. (2018). Implicit Versus Explicit Grammar Feedback. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0070
Saputri, Y. A., Rizal, S., & Afriani, Z. L. (2021). An Analysis on English Teacher Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 1(3), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v1i3.125
Setyono, B., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). The representation of multicultural values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-Endorsed EFL textbook: a critical discourse analysis. Intercultural Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1548102
Shang, H. F. (2016). Exploring demographic and motivational factors associated with hypertext reading by English as a foreign language (EFL) students. Behaviour and Information Technology, 35(7), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1094827
Sukyadi, D. (2015). The teaching of English at secondary schools in Indonesia. Secondary School English Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice, 123–147.
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage (3rd Ed). Oxford University Press.
Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2018). Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1195391
Teng, M. F. (2019). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners ’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
Tsai, K. J. (2019). Corpora and dictionaries as learning aids: inductive versus deductive approaches to constructing vocabulary knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527366
Tümen Akyıldız, S., & Çelik, V. (2021). Using WhatsApp to support EFL reading comprehension skills with Turkish early secondary learners. Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1865433
Uztosun, M. S. (2017). The development of a scale for measuring the self-regulated motivation for improving speaking English as a foreign language. The Language Learning Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1335766
Wang, H., & Chen, C. W. (2019). Learning English from YouTubers : English L2 learners ’ self-regulated language learning on YouTube. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1607356
Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465
Wawire, B. A., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2021). The role of vocabulary and decoding language skills in reading comprehension: a cross-linguistic perspective. International Multilingual Research Journal, 15(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2020.1753953
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
Yakut, A. D., & Aydın, S. (2017). An experimental study on the effects of the use of blogs on EFL reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1006634
Yazan, B. (2015). Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education : Yin , Merriam , and Stake Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education : Yin , Merriam ,. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss2/12
Zarei, M., Ahour, T., & Seifoori, Z. (2020). Impacts of implicit, explicit, and emergent feedback strategies on EFL learners’ motivation, attitude and perception. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1727130
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i1.4148
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching
Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Telp. (0736)51171,51172,51276 Fax.(0736) 51172
Website : https://uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/
Email : linguists@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Abstracting and Indexing by:
