Strategies Used by High, Medium and Low Achieving EFL Students in Learning English
Abstract
As an international language whose role and use are dominant in various aspects in this era of globalization, English is suitable to be used as the main provision for students to support their academics and careers. Therefore, it is very important to analyse the English learning Strategies applied by students so that learning has appropriate results. The Objectives of this research are to describe the types of English learning strategies used by high, medium, and low achieving students at Dehasen University Bengkulu, and to find out whether there are any differences in the use of English learning strategies among three groups. This was descriptive research. The population consisted of the students from two departments, namely physical education and Early Childhood Education year 2022-2023 were 159 students reported as students of the high (got A score), medium (got B score), and low achiever group (got C/D score). Purposive sampling technique was used. Purposive sampling technique was used. The instruments were students’ scores of English mastery and SILL questionnaire. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics by using SPSS 16 as well as in finding out the differences use of six categories of English learning strategies among the three groups. The results were as follows. All types of English learning strategies (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social strategies) were used by all groups in the “moderate” category that were in the range 2.5 to 3.4. Metacognitive strategy was the strategy with the highest rank of use, whether for high which has a 3.37 mean score or medium achiever groups which has a 3.40 mean score. Meanwhile, memory strategy was the strategy with the highest rank of use for the low achiever group which has a 3.26. Furthermore, there were no differences in the use of English learning strategies among all groups, as can be seen from the result of two-way ANOVA data analysis
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Belet, S., & Guven, M. (2011). Meta-Cognitive Strategy Usage and Epistemological Beliefs of Primary School Teacher Trainees. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11, 51-57
Bessai, N. A. (2018). Using Oxford’s strategy inventory of language learning (SILL) to assess the strategy use of a group of first and third year EFL Algerian university students. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 42(1), 166-187.
Dhanapala, K. V. (2007). Focus on language learning strategies of advanced learners in Japan and Sri Lanka. Journal of international development and cooperation, 13(1), 153-164.
Fatimah, & Sari, R. D. K. (2018). Learning and learning strategies in improving language skills. Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 1(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24853/pl.1.2.1 08-113
Fazeli, S.H. (2012). The exploring nature of methodology in the current studies of Language Learning Strategies (LLSs) with focus on strategy inventory for language learning (SILL) of Rebecca L. Oxford. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 500- 507. doi:10.4304/jltr.3.3.500-507
Getie, A.S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1738184.
Gerami, M. H., & Baighlou, S. M. G. (2011). Language learning strategies used by successful and unsuccessful iranian EFL students. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 29, 1567-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.399
Hayati, A., Afriani, Z., & Akbarjono A. (2021). Teacher’s Teaching Strategies in EFL Class.
Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 1(3), 330-341. https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v1i3.126
Hidayat, A. (2018). Language learning strategies used by successful students of SMA1 rejang lebong. Thesis, Universitas Bengkulu.
Khoshsima, H. & Tiyar, F.R. (2015). Language learner strategies for building EFL learners' autonomy. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies 3(4), 60- 73.
Kuhn 2000
Livingston, J. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. State University of New York at Buffalo.
,D.(
). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9,
178-181.
Nambiar, R. (2009). Learning strategy research – Where are we now? the Reading Matrix: An
International Online Journal, 9(2), 132-149.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New
York: Newbury House Publishers.
Paragae, I. P. N. S. (2023). Innovative teaching strategies in teaching English as a foreign
language. English Teaching and Linguistics Journal (ETLiJ), 4(1), 1-9.
Rianto, A. (2020). A study of language learning strategy use among Indonesian EFL university
students. Register Journal, 13(2), 231-256.
Rohayati, D. (2016). Analisis strategi pembelajaran bahasa dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris
sebagai bahasa asing. Mimbar Agribisnis, 1(3), 269–
https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v1i3.47
Rustam, N. S., Hamra, A., & Weda, S. (2015). The language learning strategies used by students of merchant marine studies polytechnics Makassar. ELT Worldwide, 2(2), 77- 94.
Wu, Y. (2008). Language learning strategies used by students at different proficiency levels. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4), 75-95.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v9i2.3851

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching
Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Telp. (0736)51171,51172,51276 Fax.(0736) 51172
Website : https://uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/
Email : linguists@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id 
Abstracting and Indexing by:
 












