TYPES AND APPROPRIATENESS: STUDENTS USAGE OF CONJUNCTIONS IN ACADEMIC WRITING

AGUS RIADI, NATHANIA NATHANIA, YOSAFAT BARONA VALENTINO

Abstract


Generally, to finish a bachelor’s degree in Indonesia, undergraduate students are required to compose a research article as a form of academic writing. One of the distinctive features of academic writing is explicitness, which shows the connection between the texts by using conjunctions to help the reader understand how the various parts of the text are related and how well they understand the ideas being presented. This paper aimed to explore the conjunction usage in the research articles written by nine students from three higher educational institutions in West Borneo. Using a content analysis sheet, this qualitative research was done by interpreting the context of the conjunctions used in students’ research articles and evaluating their compatibility with each purpose of the conjunctions by adopting the misuse pattern of conjunctions theory. The research procedure consisted of coding each sentence that contained a conjunction, categorizing the conjunctions based on the types, analyzing the conjunction, and classifying the conjunctions found into two categories, which are appropriate and inappropriate. The findings showed that the most frequent conjunctions used by the students are “because they tend to add information in order to elaborate on the ideas of the sentences." The result shows that the students employed a range of conjunction types, encompassing coordinating, subordinating, correlative, and compound conjunctions. Nevertheless, in their thesis articles, students predominantly favored the use of coordinating conjunctions, with "and" emerging as the most frequently utilized conjunction. Regarding the appropriateness of conjunction usage in the articles, there are 34 conjunctions misused out of 737 conjunctions. However, it is considered appropriate since the conjunctions appropriately used are much more dominant than the misuse committed.


Keywords


conjunctions; misuse of conjunctions; research articles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriani, Z.L. (2018). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative essays. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4(2), 31-47.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Abingdon, Oxon.

Fatimah, N. (2018). Students' Needs for academic writing at the English education department. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(3), 161-175.

Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2013). Life with and without coding: Two methods for early-stage data analysis. Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations,«Forum: Social qualitative research,

Hamed, M. (2014). Conjunctions in argumentative writing of Libyan tertiary students. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 108-120.

Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and coherence in written texts of students of faculty of education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 93-99.

Mohammed, A. S. (2015). Conjunctions as cohesive devices in the writings of English as second language learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 74-81.

Ong, J. (2011). Investigating the use of cohesive devices by Chinese EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(3), 42-65.

Patriana, A., Rachmajanti, S., & Mukminatien, N. (2016). Students’ ability in using discourse markers to build coherence in compositions. TEFLIN Journal, 27(2), 203-216.

Purba, D. R., & Pulungan, R. (2017). A comparative study of types of conjunctions used in the results and discussion section of student's RA and TEFLIN JAs Published in 2015. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 65-73.

Riadi, A., & Warti, F. W. (2021). Linguistic landscape: A language learning media in an underdeveloped region. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 3(1), 46-67.

Riadi, A., Gisella, & Angelina, Y. (2020). An analysis of literalness aspect of google translate in translating business correspondence. English Language Studies and Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 1-14.

Sahebkheir, F., & Aidinlou, N. A. (2014). The role of explicit instruction on using conjunctions in Iranian EFL learners' written performance. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140202.20

Salam, A., Mahfud, M., & Nurhusna, N. (2018). Characteristic of academic texts from systemic functional linguistics perspectives. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 122-134.

Syafitri, R., Arasuli, & Sembiring, B. (2017). The students’ ability in using conjunctions (A descriptive quantitative study of the sixth semester students of English study program Bengkulu university). Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 58-64.

Unubi, A. S. (2016). Conjunctions in English: Meaning, types and uses. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 4(3), 202-213.

Yuvayapan, F., & Bilginer, H. (2020). Identifying the needs of postgraduate students: The first step of academic writing courses. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 595-611.

Zhang, B. (2013). An analysis of spoken language and written language and how they affect English language learning and teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4, 834-838. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.4.834-838




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v9i2.2590

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching

Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Telp. (0736)51171,51172,51276 Fax.(0736) 51172
Website : https://uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/
Email : linguists@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id 

 

Abstracting and Indexing by: