THE FORMS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION FOUND IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM AT SMA NEGERI IN BENGKULU (A Comparative Study between Favorite and Un-Favorite Schools in Bengkulu)

Pistarman Pistarman

Abstract


The problems of this research are: how is the interaction done by the teacher and students in
English classroom in SMA Negeri in Bengkulu?and what are the differences (if any) of the
interaction process found in favorite SMA an un-favorite SMA in Bengkulu? the purpose of this
research is: to describe the interaction between teacher and students and to describes the
differences between the interaction. The forms of classroom interaction were taken from
Malcolm, 1997 and Roestiyah, 1994. They accepting feeling, complement and encouragement,
accepting or uses ideas of students, asking the studentsabout the procedure or content of study,
lecturing, giving direction to the students, criticizing or justifying authority, students response,
students initiative, answering question, silence and confusion, one way interaction, multi way
interaction.
The design of this research was descriptive method; descriptive method is a survey or
observation that describes the situation as being observed. The population of this research is
English teachers and the second year students of senior high school in favorite and in unfavorite
schools. They are SMAN 2 Bengkulu, with 190 students in 8 classes and SMAN 6
Bengkulu, with 150 students in 6 classes. The sample of this research is used randomly
sampling, from SMAN 2 Bengkulu is an English teacher and 42 students and from SMAN 6
Bengkulu is an English teacher and 44 students.
The result of this study shown that, the forms of interaction that dominant used by the teacher
and students interaction in the classroom at SMAN 2 Bengkulu and SMAN 6 Bengkulu. Those
are teacher asking question 64 times (19,16%) and 33 times (15,94%) the teacher ask to
students about procedure and content of study. Students answer question 57 times (17,06%)
and 27 times (13,04%), two way interaction 55 times (16,47%) and 29 times (14,01%), however
there is form of interaction that dominant used in SMAN 6 Bengkulu but it is not dominant used
in SMAN 2 Bengkulu. It is lecturing 18 times (8,69%) the significant differences between SMAN
2 and SMAN 6 Bengkulu interaction, can see from the result in frequency, at SMAN 2 Bengkulu
higher than SMAN 6 Bengkulu, it is caused at SMAN 6 Bengkulu students and teacher
interaction done slowly or teaching and learning process done slowly. Sometimes the teacher
and students discuss about something that is not relationship with material being taught.


Keywords


English Classes, Classroom Interaction, Favorite school, un-favorite school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 1998. Procedure Penelitian.SuatuPendekatanPraktik. Jakarta: P.T RenikaCipta

Ellis. 1994. Classroom Second Language development. London: Printice Hall

Ellis. 1994. The Study Of Second Language Acquisition, USA: oxpord University Press

Engkoswara. 1984. Dasar – dasarmetodelogiPengajaran. Jakarta: BinaAksara

Dipeitro. 1994. Strategic Interaction. USA: Cambridge University Teaching Library Press.

Hedge. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the language Classroom. USA: Oxpord University

Press

Kosmiati. 2002. Teacher’S Attitude Toward Classroom Interaction (a study of English Teacher

at Elementary School in Bengkulu Town UNIB Bengkulu: Unpublished

Malcolm. 1997. An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman Group limited

M. Yunus. 1996. The implementation of communication approach. An observation based on

students- teacher interaction in the classroom at the third years students of smun 2

talangempatnortbengkulu in 1996/1997 academic year. UNIB: Unpublished .

Novianti.2002. Communication Strategies Employed by Female and Male Students of English

Study Program of FKIP UNIB in Informal Interaction. UNIB Bengkulu:

Unpublished

Nunan, David. 1995. Language Teaching Methodology a Textbook for teacher. Phonex EIT

Nunan, David. 1995. Understanding English Classroom. Phonex EIT

Priatni, Endah Tri. 1992. KarakterstikinteraksiBelajarMenngajar. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Roestiyah.1994. MasalahPengajaranSebagaisuatu system. Jakarta: RenikaCipta

Sardiman. 1987. InteraksidanMotivasiBelajarMengajar. Bandung: Angkasa

SavignonDkk. 1983.Communication Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Wesley:

Addison-Wesley Publishing Company

Soetomo. 1993. Dasar-dasarInteraksidanMotivasiBelajarMengajar. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sriyono. 1992. TeknikBelajarMengajarDalam CBSA. Jakarta: RenikaCipta

Sudjana, Nana. 1991. Cara BelajarSiswaAktifdalam Proses BelajarMengajar. Bandung:

Angkasa.

Susilawati. 2002. A Study Of Teacher-Students Interaction in an English Classroom at SLTP

II Bengkulu. UNIB Bengkulu: Unpublished

Tim Penyusun, 1989. KamusBesarBahasa Indonesia.Edisikedua. Jakarta: BalaiPustaka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v2i2.112

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching

Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Telp. (0736)51171,51172,51276 Fax.(0736) 51172
Website : https://uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/
Email : linguists@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id 

 

Abstracting and Indexing by: