Komparasi Pemikiran Yunan Yusuf dan Nasharuddin Baidan dalam Pemetaan Karya Tafsir di Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to compare the thoughts of M Yunan Yusuf and Nashruddin Baidan regarding the mapping of Tafsir works in Indonesia. As a country with the largest Muslim population in the world, Indonesia has a myriad of scholars with expertise in the field of interpretation such as Buya Hamka, M Quraish Shihab, Nuruddin al-Raniri, Abdurrauf Al-Sinkili, Hamzah Fansuri and others. Mapping Tafsir's work can be the first step to open the ocean of knowledge presented in Tafsir's works in Indonesia and facilitate understanding of Tafsir's views proposed by the author. On the other hand, mapping can play a role in facilitating a comparison of ideas offered by commentators, so that readers can take a point of view that is in line with the reality they are currently facing. This research study uses a qualitative approach, with literature study techniques as the basis for the majority of research. Primary data is taken from the ideas of M Yunan Yusuf and Nashruddin Baidan. The research analysis uses the steps of the Miles and Huberman procedure. The research findings show several main points: 1) The structure of the Tafsir mapping according to Nashruddin Baidan is broader than the structure of the methodology mapped by Yunan Yusuf, 2) Compared to M. Yunan Yusuf, Nashruddin Baidan's mapping provides more encouragement for the study of Tafsir Al-Qur' an to master the science of Tafsir, because the science of Tafsir is a scientific discipline that must be mastered and applied by people who want to interpret the verses of the Qur'an, so that their interpretation does not deviate from the meaning intended by Allah swt.