Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan adalah jurnal ilmiah yang menerbitkan tulisan ilmiah yang spesifiknya mencangkup tentang hukum Islam dan Peradilan. Diantaranya tentang munakahat, fiqh, hadis, ijma’ ulama, al-quran, putusan pengadilan agama, putusan pengadilan negeri, hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum adat, undang-undang, Surat Keputusan, Peraturan Daerah, Peraturan Pemerintah, Peraturan Presiden, Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) dan pembahasan hukum yang memiliki relevansi dengan focus dan scop Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Island an Peradilan.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Description
Submissions should be prepared in accordance with the Author Guidelines. The manuscript may be returned to authors without a scientific assessment if they do not meet all submission requirements, if they are not in the correct format, or cannot be downloaded reliably.
Submissions must represent the original and independent work of the authors. Each new submission is assessed by Principal Editor to determine whether it falls within the general remit of the Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan. We will reject a manuscript without review if it contains insufficient content; it exceeds our word limit or is incorrectly formatted; it is poorly presented and unclear. Manuscripts that pass the initial assessment will be handled by Principal Editor or Associate Editor to oversee the review process for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation.
Once a manuscript passes the initial checks, it will be assigned to at least TWO independent experts for peer-review. A DOUBLE-BLIND review is applied, where authors' identities are not known to reviewers, and vice versa. Peer review comments are confidential and will only be disclosed with the express agreement of the reviewer. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and authors can expect a decision, or an explanation for the delay, within 2-4 months of receipt. If a revision is invited, the corresponding author should submit the revised manuscript within 2-4 weeks. The final decision is taken by Principal Editors and/or by the Section Editor based on the information gained through the peer-review process.


We ensure that the reviewed manuscript is treated confidentially prior to being published, as explained in publication ethics.
Types of Decision
There are four types of editorial decisions during the peer review process, which are:
 
Decline submission
Following peer review, the paper is judged not to be acceptable for publication in  of  Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan.
Resubmit for Review
The submitted version of the paper is not acceptable and requires major revision, but there is clear potential in the work, and of  Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan is prepared to consider a new version. Authors are offered the opportunity to resubmit their paper as a new submission. Concerns will remain regarding the suitability of the paper for publication until the editors are convinced by the authors that their paper fits the scope and standards of Journal of  Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan. The resubmitted manuscript will be returned to the original associate editor if at all possible.

Revision
The paper requires changes before a final decision can be made. Authors are asked to modify their manuscript in light of comments received from referees and editors and to submit a new version for consideration within 2 weeks of receiving the decision letter. A point-by-point explanation of how comments have been addressed must be supplied with the revised version of the paper. Revisions may undergo further peer review and papers may undergo more than one round of revision. If the authors do not revise their papers to the satisfaction of the editors, the paper can still be declined from publication in Journal of Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan.

Accept submission
The paper is accepted for publication, subject to conditions that need to be addressed in producing a final version of the manuscript. These may include sub-editing changes and the minor amendment to ensure the paper fully matches our criteria. After final checking in the editorial office, acceptance is confirmed and the paper is forwarded to the publishers for publication.
 
Galley Proof
Page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for final checking. Corrections to the proofs must be restricted to printer’s errors: any other changes to the text, in equations or grammar, may be charged to the author. Proofs should be returned to the editors within three days of receipt to minimize the risk of the author’s contribution having to be held over to a later issue. The editors do not accept responsibility for the correctness of published content. It is the author’s responsibility to check the content at the proof stage.
 
Editorial and Publishing Process
Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan follows the editorial and publishing process set by PKP, as presented in the following figure.

 

Publication Frequency

Qiyas Jurnal Hukum Islam dan peradilan is published two times a year:

  • Issue 1 : January - April
  • Issue 2 : May - October

each issue consists of a minimum of ten articles.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

PUBLICATION ETHIC

Qiyas Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan is a peer-reviewed electronic national journal, available in print and online and published two times a year. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer  and the publisher UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu (UIN FAS Bengkulu)

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Qiyas Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

UIN FAS Bengkulu as publisher of Qiyas Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the Qiyas Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Screening for Plagiarsm

Statement and Policy
Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan applies Zero tolerance towards plagiarism and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in the journal.

Definition: Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Policy: Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

All submitted papers will be checked of their similarity by Turnitin or Ithenticate.

When plagiarism is identified, the Principal Editor responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

Similarity Level
Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan practices Zero tolerance towards plagiarism. We use Turnitin or Ithenticate to evaluate the similarity index and then the editor decides the case of possible plagiarism (Similarity report will be provided to the author). Editorial board has passed the following actions:

  1. Similarity Index above 40%: Article Rejected (due to poor citation and/or poor paraphrasing, article outright rejected, NO RESUBMISSION accepted).
  2. Similarity Index (15-40%): Send to the author for improvement (provide correct citations to all places of similarity and do good paraphrasing even if the citation is provided).
  3. Similarity index Less than 10%: Accepted or citation improvement may be required (proper citations must be provided to all outsourced texts).
  4. In cases 2 and 3: The authors should revise the article carefully, add required citations, and do good paraphrasing to outsourced text. And resubmit the article with a new Turnitin report showing NO PLAGIARISM and similarity less than 15%.

 

Withdrawal Manuscript

Bagaimana cara meminta penarikan naskah
Ketika seorang penulis memutuskan untuk menarik naskahnya, penting untuk mengikuti pedoman jurnal untuk penarikan naskah. Cara termudah untuk meminta penarikan naskah adalah secara online, melalui portal pengiriman jurnal reguler. Jika opsi penarikan naskah tidak tersedia, sebaiknya hubungi editor jurnal yang bertanggung jawab atas naskah Anda. Alternatifnya, merupakan ide bagus untuk menulis surat kepada editor jurnal untuk meminta penarikan. Saat menulis surat kepada editor jurnal, pastikan untuk mencantumkan judul naskah, nama penulis, dan alasan penarikan. Anda dapat merujuk pada contoh surat berikut untuk menarik naskah sebagai templat ketika meminta editor untuk menarik naskah:
 
Yang terhormat [nama Editor],
Saya menulis surat ini untuk meminta penarikan naskah saya yang berjudul [judul naskah] dari pertimbangan untuk diterbitkan di [nama jurnal]. Naskah diserahkan pada [tanggal penyerahan] dan telah diberi nomor referensi [nomor referensi].
Alasan penarikan adalah [alasan penarikan]. Saya mohon maaf atas ketidaknyamanan yang ditimbulkan dan terima kasih atas waktu dan pertimbangan Anda.
 
Tempat tinggal penulis, tanggal, bulan dan tahun,
[Namamu dan TTD]
[Rincian kontak]

Konsekuensi dari penarikan naskah
Namun, sebelum Anda menarik naskah, ingatlah bahwa editor dan reviewer jurnal mungkin telah menginvestasikan banyak waktu dan upaya dalam meninjau naskah Anda. Faktanya, sebagian besar jurnal tidak menganjurkan penarikan naskah. Permintaan seperti itu biasanya akan dikenakan sanksi yang berat jika peneliti tidak dapat memberikan penjelasan yang meyakinkan atas keputusan mereka. Sebagian besar jurnal dengan jelas menyebutkan kebijakan penarikan diri mereka di situs web mereka dan editor dapat menjatuhkan sanksi atau mengambil tindakan hukuman yang serius, seperti larangan bagi peneliti untuk mengirimkan artikel ke jurnal tersebut.  Oleh karena itu, penting untuk memastikan bahwa alasan penarikan tidak dapat disangkal dan meyakinkan, misalnya jika Anda mengetahui bahwa jurnal saat ini bersifat predator.

 

Digital Preservation

Arsip merupakan dokumen atau catatan penting yang mengandung berbagai informasi berharga bagi lembaga yang mengeluarkannya, sehingga tentunya arsip perlu dikelola secara baik. Salah satu cara pelestarian arsip yaitu dengan melakukan digitalisasi arsip utamanya pada era digitial ini. Terdapat dua cara pelestarian arsip terkususnya arsip statis, yaitu dengan cara preservasi dan konservasi arsip. Preservasi Preventif adalah upaya pemeliharaan arsip dengan melakukan tindakan preventif dan menghindari semua bahaya yang akan mengancam kelestarian arsip. Adapun Preservasi kuratif merupakan preservasi arsip yang  bersifat perbaikan atau perawatan terhadap arsip yang sudah mulai rusak, kondisinya memburuk. Preservasi kuratif dilakukan untuk dapat dapat memperpanjang umur arsip. Di era teknologi digital arsip dapat dimodifikasi menjadi bentuk digital yang dapat memudahkan dalam pecarian, dan digitalisasi arsip juga dapat menjadi alternatif pelestarian arsip. Kemudian cara selanjutnya dalam pelestarian arsip adalah konservasi. Konservasi merupakan sebuah konsep yang mencakup konservasi preventif (pencegahan) yang bermaksud mengurangi risiko penurunan : kontrol lingkungan, perawatan dan perlindungan rutin koleksi arsip dengan menggunakan penanganan yang memadai, sarana anti pencurian dan membuat dokumen tiruan bagi dokumen asli yang sering digunakan.

 

Article Processing Charge

Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan does not charge authors submission and publication fees. The journal is owned by the Department of Islamic Education Management Postgraduate UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu that supports the operation and publication process. Therefore, the majority of the publication cost is funded by the faculty to allow for articles to be made freely available Open Access to all readers, anywhere in the world.

 

 

Deposit Policy

Berikut ini adalah Kebijakan Deposit Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan.
Penulis dapat menyimpan dokumen artikel baik saat sedang dikirimkan, sudah diterima, ataupun telah diterbitkan Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan pada :

  1. Situs web pribadi
  2. Repositori institusi.
  3. Jejaring kolaborasi sosial/Social Collaboration Networks (SCNs) yang telah menandatangani Prinsip Berbagi Sukarela.
  4. Individu yang meminta penggunaan pribadi untuk pengajaran dan pelatihan dalam institusi Penulis, dan sebagai bagian dari aplikasi hibah Penulis selama digunakan untuk tujuan pendidikan dan sosial.