Rekayasa Zero Comparison Effect Pada Wakaf Saham Terhadap  Transisi Mindset Wakif

Evan Stiawan

doi:10.29300/nuansa.v15i1.3623

Rekayasa Zero Comparison Effect Pada Wakaf Saham Terhadap Transisi Mindset Wakif

Evan Stiawan

Abstract

Penelitian ini merekayasa seorang wakif pada wakaf saham terhadap transisi minset pada saat Zero Comaprison Effect. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui strategi pengembangan metode minat membayar zakat melalui wakaf saham di Indonesia yang dilihat tipikal persfektif minset seorang wakif. Metode analisis data dalam penelitian menggunakan metode Anova One Way dengan mmetofe experiemtnal Design 2 x 2. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Pada kondisi Wakif Deliberative Mindset cenderung lebih tinggi Kontrol saat ditawarkan pilihan produk wakaf terbaru yaitu wakaf saham dapat ditunjukan dari nilai rerata kelompok kontrol lebih tinggi dari pada rerata kelompok Deliberative Mindset. Kesimpulan selanjutnya yaitu Khusus untuk kelompok Pada kondisi Wakif Implemntal Mindset cenderung lebih rendah Kontrol saat ditawarkan pilihan produk wakaf terbaru yaitu wakaf saham. Dari uraian tersebut dapat ditunjukan bahwa minset dapat distimulus melalui kontrol Zero Comparison Effect dapat menjadi dasar dalam kegiatan edukasi wakaf saham.

Keywords

Wakaf Saham, Wakaf Produktif, Minset, Zero Comparison Effect.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 187–217.

Gunasti, Kunter and William T. Ross (2009), “How Inferences about Missing Attributes Decrease the Tendency to Defer Choice and Increase Purchase Probability,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35(February), 823-39.

Gollwitzer, P.M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. InE. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53-92).

New York: Guilford. Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.

Gollwitzer, P.M.,& Bayer,U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control faction. InS. Chaiken & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403-422).

New York: Guilford. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186-199.

Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1119-1127.

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mindsets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531-

Hair, J.F.Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis 5th Ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Heyman, James and Dan Ariely (2004), “Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets,” Psychological Science, 15(November), 787-93.

Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (March), 265–91.

Kivetz, Ran and Itamar Simonson (2000), “The Effects of Incomplete Information on Consumer Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (November), 427-48.

Palmeira, Mauricio M. and H. Shanker Krishnan (2008), “Criteria Instability and the Isolated Option Effect,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106 (July), 153-67.

Shampanier, Kristina, Nina Mazar, and Dan Ariely (2007), “Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products,” Marketing

Science, 26 (November), 742-57. Shiv, Baba and Joel Huber (2000), “The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (September), 202-16.

Simonson, Itamar (1989), “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (September), 158– 73.

___________ (1992), “The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (June), 105-118.

imonson, Itamar and Amos Tversky (1992), “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281- 95.

Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1991), “Loss Aversion and Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (November), 1039–62.

Tversky, Amos and Itamar Simonson

(1993), “Context-Dependent Preferences,” Management Science, 39 (October), 1179-89.

Wernerfelt, Birger (1995), “A Rational Reconstruction of the Compromise Effect: Using Market Data to Infer Utilities,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (March), 627-33. Wong, Kin Fai Ellick and Jessica Y. Y.

Kwong (2005), “Comparing Two Tiny Giants or Two Huge Dwarfs? Preference Reversals Owing to Number Size Framing,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98 (September), 54-65.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/nuansa.v15i1.3623