Federated Search in Libraries: An Overview in Academic Libraries
Abstract
One essential piece of technology that simplifies the process of finding information across a variety of databases and sources in academic libraries is federated search systems. By using a single query interface, these systems, also known as meta-search engines, allow users to simultaneously search through a variety of resources, such as databases, books, and electronic journals. By combining results from several publishers and platforms into a single format, this feature greatly improves the efficacy and efficiency of academic research while also saving time and streamlining user interactions. An overview of federated search technology is given in this study, with particular attention on how it might be integrated into academic libraries. It talks about how these systems have developed, the technological difficulties they provide, and the advantages they have for educational institutions. The research also looks at case studies from different university libraries to showcase effective implementations. It also discusses the possibility for federated search systems in the future, including the incorporation of machine learning and artificial intelligence to enhance and customize search results. The purpose of this overview is to highlight the value of federated search engines in improving the usability and accessibility of scholarly materials, therefore assisting academic institutions in their larger endeavors to promote research and learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bell, S. J., & Dempsey, L. (2009). The impact of federated search technologies on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 118-131.
Lewis, R. (2006). Federated search engines for the academic environment. Library Philosophy and Practice, 8(2), 1-6.
Lawson, K. (2011). Library technology and digital resources: An introduction for support staff. Rowman & Littlefield.
Breeding, M. (2007). Federated search engines: Technology that drives information accessibility. Library Technology Reports, 43(6), 5-22.
Howell, T. K., & Kemp, J. J. (2005). Implementing federated searching across library collections. The Electronic Library, 23(2), 174-187.
Hane, P. J. (2008). Integrating resources across library collections. Library Resources & Technical Services, 52(3), 143-152.
Olson, T. A., & Hansen, S. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of federated search products. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 6(3), 195-206.
Yang, S. Q., & Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: How close are we to the ideal?. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(4), 295-303.
Tennant, R. (2004). The promise and peril of federated search. Library Journal, 129(13), 36-39.
Eastman, C. M., & Jansen, B. J. (2010). Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on web-based search engine results. Information Processing & Management, 46(6), 785-804.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination b. Sage Publications.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1–26.
Yaman, A., Yoganingrum, A., Yaniasih, S. R., & Riyanto, S. (2019). Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis Pada Basis Data Pustaka Digital: Tren Riset, Metodologi, dan Coverage Fields. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 40(1), 1–20.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
Bates, M. J. (2002). "Toward an Integrated Model of Information Seeking and Searching." New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, pp. 1-15.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mkt.v9i1.3559
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed By :
